Literature DB >> 15474202

Preferences in end-of-life care of older persons: after-death interviews with proxy respondents.

Marianne Klinkenberg1, Dick L Willems, Bregje D Onwuteaka-Philipsen, Dorly J H Deeg, Gerrit van der Wal.   

Abstract

This population-based study employing after-death interviews with proxies describes older persons' preferences regarding medical care at the end of life. Interviews were held with 270 proxy respondents of 342 deceased persons (age range 59-91) in the Netherlands, The deceased were respondents to the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam. The prevalence of advance directives (ADs), preferences for medical decisions at the end of life (i.e. withholding treatment, physician-assisted suicide euthanasia) and preferences about the focus of treatment in the last week of life (i.e. comfort care versus extending life) were examined. Written ADs were present in 14% of the sample. A quarter had designated a surrogate decision-maker. Co-morbidity and perceived self-efficacy (PSE) were positively associated with ADs. About half the sample had expressed a preference in favour or against one or more medical decisions at the end of life. Predictors positively associated with expressing a preference were co-morbidity, dying from cancer, and PSE. Being religious was negatively associated with expressing a preference. The knowledge of the proxy regarding the older person's preference for the focus of treatment was dependent on the patient's symptom burden as perceived by the proxy. The majority of older persons had died without either an AD, or having expressed preferences for end-of-life care. Stimulating the formulation of ADs may help professionals who work with older people to understand these preferences better, especially in the case of non-cancer patients and those with low PSE.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15474202     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.04.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  5 in total

Review 1.  Theories of Health Care Decision Making at the End of Life: A Meta-Ethnography.

Authors:  Kyounghae Kim; Katherine Heinze; Jiayun Xu; Melissa Kurtz; Hyunjeong Park; Megan Foradori; Marie T Nolan
Journal:  West J Nurs Res       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 1.967

2.  Voices of African American, Caucasian, and Hispanic surrogates on the burdens of end-of-life decision making.

Authors:  Ursula K Braun; Rebecca J Beyth; Marvella E Ford; Laurence B McCullough
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-01-03       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 3.  Culture and end of life care: a scoping exercise in seven European countries.

Authors:  Marjolein Gysels; Natalie Evans; Arantza Meñaca; Erin Andrew; Franco Toscani; Sylvia Finetti; H Roeline Pasman; Irene Higginson; Richard Harding; Robert Pool
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Advance care planning dispositions: the relationship between knowledge and perception.

Authors:  Anne Cattagni Kleiner; Brigitte Santos-Eggimann; Sarah Fustinoni; Anne-Véronique Dürst; Katja Haunreiter; Eve Rubli-Truchard; Laurence Seematter-Bagnoud
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 3.921

5.  Death and the Oldest Old: Attitudes and Preferences for End-of-Life Care--Qualitative Research within a Population-Based Cohort Study.

Authors:  Jane Fleming; Morag Farquhar; Carol Brayne; Stephen Barclay
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.