OBJECTIVE: To verify whether combined measurements of GH-dependent parameters might be useful in detecting exogenous recombinant GH (rGH) administration in male athletes from different disciplines. METHODS: Sixty-six athletes (control group) were sampled for the evaluation of resting IGF-I, N-terminal propeptide of type III procollagen (PIIINP) and telopeptide type I collagen (ICTP). Cut-off values (mean + 2 SD) for IGF-I, PIIINP and ICTP were calculated and arbitrary scores (1.5, 2.0) were assigned to abnormal parameters. By using the sum of individual parameter scores, positive (> or = 3) or negative (< 3) scores were obtained. In addition, a subgroup of six athletes was treated for 3 weeks with rGH (0.09 IU/kg body weight, 6 days/week) and was similarly evaluated at the end of the 1st, 2nd and 3rd week (i.e. 18 samples). RESULTS: Abnormal IGF-I, or PIIINP or ICTP levels were found, respectively, in one, two and four subjects (1.5-6.1%) of the control group (in the younger athletes); only one 19-year-old subject of this group obtained a positive score. Abnormal IGF-I, PIIINP and ICTP levels were found in 61.1-66.7% samples of the treated group. Positive cases were 3/6 at the 1st and 2nd week and 6/6 at the 3rd week. The sensitivity of the screening approach was 50-100% (at the 1st-2nd and 3rd week, respectively) and specificity was 98.5%. CONCLUSION: This 'first level' screening test is safe, acceptable and relatively inexpensive. Further additional investigations of 'second level' (i.e. GH secretory profile, GH response to a GH-releasing peptide) can be retained to validate or exclude rGH administration or for the early diagnosis of infrequent endogenous GH hypersecretion.
OBJECTIVE: To verify whether combined measurements of GH-dependent parameters might be useful in detecting exogenous recombinant GH (rGH) administration in male athletes from different disciplines. METHODS: Sixty-six athletes (control group) were sampled for the evaluation of resting IGF-I, N-terminal propeptide of type III procollagen (PIIINP) and telopeptide type I collagen (ICTP). Cut-off values (mean + 2 SD) for IGF-I, PIIINP and ICTP were calculated and arbitrary scores (1.5, 2.0) were assigned to abnormal parameters. By using the sum of individual parameter scores, positive (> or = 3) or negative (< 3) scores were obtained. In addition, a subgroup of six athletes was treated for 3 weeks with rGH (0.09 IU/kg body weight, 6 days/week) and was similarly evaluated at the end of the 1st, 2nd and 3rd week (i.e. 18 samples). RESULTS: Abnormal IGF-I, or PIIINP or ICTP levels were found, respectively, in one, two and four subjects (1.5-6.1%) of the control group (in the younger athletes); only one 19-year-old subject of this group obtained a positive score. Abnormal IGF-I, PIIINP and ICTP levels were found in 61.1-66.7% samples of the treated group. Positive cases were 3/6 at the 1st and 2nd week and 6/6 at the 3rd week. The sensitivity of the screening approach was 50-100% (at the 1st-2nd and 3rd week, respectively) and specificity was 98.5%. CONCLUSION: This 'first level' screening test is safe, acceptable and relatively inexpensive. Further additional investigations of 'second level' (i.e. GH secretory profile, GH response to a GH-releasing peptide) can be retained to validate or exclude rGH administration or for the early diagnosis of infrequent endogenous GH hypersecretion.
Authors: A Sartorio; M Jubeau; F Agosti; N Marazzi; A Rigamonti; E E Müller; N A Maffiuletti Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: P Sgrò; M Sansone; A Parisi; A Sartorio; A Sansone; F Romanelli; A Lenzi; L Di Luigi Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2016-05-26 Impact factor: 4.256