Literature DB >> 15473807

On the performance of molecular polarization methods. I. Water and carbon tetrachloride close to a point charge.

Marco Masia1, Michael Probst, Rossend Rey.   

Abstract

The three main methods to implement molecular polarization (point dipoles, fluctuating charges, and shell model) are tested against high level ab initio calculations for a molecule (water, carbon tetrachloride) close to a point charge (at the distance of a lithium or magnesium ion). The goal is to check whether an approximation (linear polarization) strictly valid at large intermolecular distances is sufficiently accurate for liquid state molecular dynamics simulations, where strong polarization effects are to be expected at short separations. The monitored observable is the molecular dipole moment as a function of the charge-molecule distance for selected molecular orientations. Analytic formulas are derived for the components of the molecular polarization tensor, facilitating the optimization of the performance for each polarization method as a function of its underlying parameters. Overall, the methods studied provide a remarkably good representation of the induced dipole, with no divergences appearing even at the shortest distances. For water close to a monovalent point charge the point dipole model, implemented with one or three dipoles, accurately reproduces the water dipole moment at all distances. Deficiencies appear as the molecular polarizability and/or charge increase: basically, the ab initio induced moments grow faster at intermediate distances than the linear increase characteristic of the phenomenological polarization methods, suggesting that nonlinear effects (hyperpolarizability) cannot be neglected in these cases. Regarding the capabilities of each method, the point dipole method is the one that performs best overall, with the shell model achieving acceptable results in most instances. The fluctuating charge method shows some noticeable limitations for implementations of comparable complexity (in terms of the number of sites required).

Entities:  

Year:  2004        PMID: 15473807     DOI: 10.1063/1.1791637

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Phys        ISSN: 0021-9606            Impact factor:   3.488


  5 in total

1.  Folding of gas-phase polyalanines in a static electric field: alignment, deformations, and polarization effects.

Authors:  F Calvo; P Dugourd
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-01-25       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Molecular modeling and dynamics studies with explicit inclusion of electronic polarizability. Theory and applications.

Authors:  Pedro E M Lopes; Benoit Roux; Alexander D Mackerell
Journal:  Theor Chem Acc       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.702

3.  Polarizable Atomic Multipole-based Molecular Mechanics for Organic Molecules.

Authors:  Pengyu Ren; Chuanjie Wu; Jay W Ponder
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 6.006

4.  Capturing Many-Body Interactions with Classical Dipole Induction Models.

Authors:  Chengwen Liu; Rui Qi; Qiantao Wang; J-P Piquemal; Pengyu Ren
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 6.006

5.  Exploring optimization strategies for improving explicit water models: Rigid n-point model and polarizable model based on Drude oscillator.

Authors:  Yeyue Xiong; Alexey V Onufriev
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.