Literature DB >> 15473616

Evaluation of intensive care unit performance in Lithuania using the SAPS II system.

S Vosylius1, J Sipylaite, J Ivaskevicius.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: Outcome prediction and evaluation of intensive care unit (ICU) performance using severity of illness scoring is a tool for the estimation of effectiveness and quality of intensive care. We used the simplified acute physiology score (SAPS) II system to evaluate ICU performance.
METHODS: The present study is a prospective observational study in an ICU at Vilnius University Emergency Hospital, Lithuania. The observed death rate was compared with the predicted death rate calculated using SAPS II system. The ability of the SAPS II prognostic system to predict the probability of hospital mortality was assessed with discrimination and calibration measures.
RESULTS: Two-thousand-and-sixty-seven patients consecutively admitted to the ICU were studied. The median SAPS II score on the first ICU day was 29. The SAPS II system showed a good ability to separate those patients predicted to live from those predicted to die (an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.883). The calibration curve demonstrated under-prediction of the actual death rate (Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test, chi2 = 56.98; df = 8; P < 0.001). The observed mortality was higher than predicted by the SAPS II equation (observed to predicted ratio is 1.28).
CONCLUSIONS: The SAPS II system is a useful tool for the assessment of ICU performance. This system demonstrated a good ability of discrimination, but an under-prediction of the actual mortality rate, in Lithuanian ICUs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15473616     DOI: 10.1017/s0265021504008063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol        ISSN: 0265-0215            Impact factor:   4.330


  4 in total

1.  Letter of apology and notice of retraction.

Authors:  Kristian Desa
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.351

Review 2.  The prognostic factors for patients with hematological malignancies admitted to the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Qian Cheng; Yishu Tang; Qing Yang; Erhua Wang; Jing Liu; Xin Li
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-11-29

3.  Determinants of the calibration of SAPS II and SAPS 3 mortality scores in intensive care: a European multicenter study.

Authors:  Antoine Poncet; Thomas V Perneger; Paolo Merlani; Maurizia Capuzzo; Christophe Combescure
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 9.097

4.  Prognostic performance of the Simplified Acute Physiology Score II in major Croatian hospitals: a prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Kristian Desa; Mladen Peric; Ino Husedzinovic; Alan Sustic; Andelko Korusic; Vjekoslav Karadza; Drazen Matlekovic; Branka Prstec-Veronek; Marta Zuvic-Butorac; Jadranko Sokolic; Mladen Siranovic; Danica Bosnjak; Jasna Spicek-Macan; Denis Gustin; Drazenka Ozeg-Jakopovic
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.351

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.