Literature DB >> 15473534

Ozone exposures and implications for vegetation in rural areas of the central Appalachian Mountains, U.S.A.

Pamela Edwards1, Cindy Huber, Frederica Wood.   

Abstract

The United States is making the transition from the 1979 1 hr maximum ozone standard to the newly adopted 8 hr ozone standard (3 yr average of the 4th highest maximum 8 hr ozone concentration). Consequently, we analyzed and compared ozone concentrations under both standards from a variety of monitoring sites throughout the central Appalachian region of Kentucky (KY), West Virginia (WV), and Virginia (VA). Data from 1988-1999 were used to determine how ozone exposure between the two metrics compared for remote sites. Most sites exceeded the 1 hr standard in 1988-1990 due to the 3 yr averaging and multiple high ozone concentrations that occurred over the region in 1988. All sites were in compliance with the 1 hr standard every year after 1991. It was much more common for the ozone exposure to exceed the 8 hr standard, particularly from 1997-1999. Many sites showed exceedences beginning in 1995; Big Meadows (VA) exceeded the 8 hr standard all years except 1994 and 1996. Response of vegetation to ozone in these areas was determined using the combination of W126 values (sigmoidally weighted exposure index), the number of hours that average concentrations > or = 0.10 ppm (N100), and the presence of moderate or more extreme droughts. In general, W126 and N100 values suggested that negative vegetation growth responses over most of the 12 yr would have been minimal for most sites, even for those exceeding ozone standards. Drought-induced stomatal closures would have overridden more extreme negative growth responses at all but the Big Meadows site in 1988.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15473534     DOI: 10.1023/b:emas.0000038184.65332.f6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  6 in total

1.  NCLAN results and their application to the standard-setting process: protecting vegetation from surface ozone exposures. National Crop Loss Assessment Network.

Authors:  A S Lefohn; J K Foley
Journal:  J Air Waste Manage Assoc       Date:  1992-08

2.  The characterization of ozone concentrations at a select set of high-elevation sites in the eastern United States.

Authors:  A S Lefohn; D S Shadwick; V A Mohnen
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 8.071

3.  Photosynthetic productivity of aspen clones varying in sensitivity to tropospheric ozone.

Authors:  M D Coleman; J G Isebrands; R E Dickson; D F Karnosky
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 4.196

4.  Rural Ozone Across the Eastern United States: Analysis of CASTNet Data, 1988-1995.

Authors:  Ralph E Baumgardner; Eric S Edgerton
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.235

5.  Water Stress Reduces Ozone Injury via a Stomatal Mechanism.

Authors:  D T Tingey; W E Hogsett
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 8.340

6.  Seasonal patterns of light-saturated photosynthesis and leaf conductance for mature and seedling Quercus rubra L. foliage: differential sensitivity to ozone exposure.

Authors:  P J Hanson; L J Samuelson; S D Wullschleger; T A Tabberer; G S Edwards
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.196

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.