Literature DB >> 15473077

Malignant mesothelioma surveillance: a comparison of ICD 10 mortality data with SEER incidence data in nine areas of the United States.

Germania A Pinheiro1, Vinicius C S Antao, Ki Moon Bang, Michael D Attfield.   

Abstract

With the implementation in 1999 of ICD-10 death certificate coding in the United States, mortality data specific to malignant mesothelioma became readily available on a national basis. To evaluate the accuracy and completeness of diagnosis and coding for mesothelioma on the death certificate, mortality information was compared with incidence data. A mortality/incidence ratio was calculated for each of the nine areas covered by the SEER Program, using National Vital Statistics mortality data from 1999 and 2000, and the SEER incidence data for 1998 and 1999. The mortality/incidence ratio for the two years combined for all areas was 0.82. Only two areas (Connecticut and Atlanta) had ratios <80%. The overall correlation coefficient between mortality and incidence rates was 0.96. Thus, mortality data coded using ICD-10 can be a valid source for mesothelioma surveillance and can be instituted without major cost if a national mortality statistics program based on ICD-10 is in place, making it feasible even for developing countries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15473077     DOI: 10.1179/oeh.2004.10.3.251

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Occup Environ Health        ISSN: 1077-3525


  7 in total

Review 1.  Malignant mesothelioma: facts, myths, and hypotheses.

Authors:  Michele Carbone; Bevan H Ly; Ronald F Dodson; Ian Pagano; Paul T Morris; Umran A Dogan; Adi F Gazdar; Harvey I Pass; Haining Yang
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 6.384

2.  Mapping cancer mortality-to-incidence ratios to illustrate racial and sex disparities in a high-risk population.

Authors:  James R Hébert; Virginie G Daguise; Deborah M Hurley; Rebecca C Wilkerson; Catishia M Mosley; Swann A Adams; Robin Puett; James B Burch; Susan E Steck; Susan W Bolick-Aldrich
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Malignant pleural mesothelioma: an epidemiological perspective.

Authors:  Benjamin M Robinson
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-11

Review 4.  Applying definitions of "asbestos" to environmental and "low-dose" exposure levels and health effects, particularly malignant mesothelioma.

Authors:  B W Case; J L Abraham; G Meeker; F D Pooley; K E Pinkerton
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 6.393

5.  Factors affecting the mesothelioma detection rate within national and international epidemiological studies: insights from Scottish linked cancer registry-mortality data.

Authors:  D R Camidge; D L Stockton; M Bain
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2006-08-08       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Quantitative relationships of exposure to chrysotile asbestos and mesothelioma mortality.

Authors:  Dana Loomis; David B Richardson; Leslie Elliott
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 2.214

7.  Cancer and non-cancer mortality among French uranium cycle workers: the TRACY cohort.

Authors:  Eric Samson; Irwin Piot; Sergey Zhivin; David B Richardson; Pierre Laroche; Ana-Paula Serond; Dominique Laurier; Olivier Laurent
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 2.692

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.