BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the possible benefit of postoperative immunosuppressive drugs administration (ie, azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine, or methotrexate) on long-term surgical recurrence rate after second anastomotic ileocolonic resection. METHODS: From 1984 to 2000, 26 patients with CD underwent second resection for ileocolonic anastomotic recurrence. There were 14 women and 12 men (mean age +/- SD: 34 +/- 9 years). Two groups of patients were compared according to the postoperative treatment: immunosuppressive (IS) drugs group was composed of 14 patients, and control group was composed of 12 patients receiving either salicylates (n = 5) or no treatment (n = 7). RESULTS: Clinical recurrence rate at 3 years was significantly lower in the IS group than in the control group (3/12, 25% vs 6/10, 60%; P < 0.05). Although not significant, after a mean follow-up of 80 +/- 46 months (extr. 17-178 months) after the second resection, clinical recurrence rate at follow-up was also lower in IS group (6/14, 43%) than in control group (9/12, 75%). The mean delay of recurrence was similar in both groups (27 +/- 13 months vs 28 +/- 21; NS). A third intestinal resection was performed less frequently in the IS group than in control group (2/14, 17% vs 7/12, 58%; P < 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In patients treated with IS drugs, the rate of postoperative recurrence after second ileocolonic CD resection is lower than in untreated patients. Our results suggest that IS drugs should be evaluated prospectively for prevention of second postoperative CD recurrence. Copyright 2004 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the possible benefit of postoperative immunosuppressive drugs administration (ie, azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine, or methotrexate) on long-term surgical recurrence rate after second anastomotic ileocolonic resection. METHODS: From 1984 to 2000, 26 patients with CD underwent second resection for ileocolonic anastomotic recurrence. There were 14 women and 12 men (mean age +/- SD: 34 +/- 9 years). Two groups of patients were compared according to the postoperative treatment: immunosuppressive (IS) drugs group was composed of 14 patients, and control group was composed of 12 patients receiving either salicylates (n = 5) or no treatment (n = 7). RESULTS: Clinical recurrence rate at 3 years was significantly lower in the IS group than in the control group (3/12, 25% vs 6/10, 60%; P < 0.05). Although not significant, after a mean follow-up of 80 +/- 46 months (extr. 17-178 months) after the second resection, clinical recurrence rate at follow-up was also lower in IS group (6/14, 43%) than in control group (9/12, 75%). The mean delay of recurrence was similar in both groups (27 +/- 13 months vs 28 +/- 21; NS). A third intestinal resection was performed less frequently in the IS group than in control group (2/14, 17% vs 7/12, 58%; P < 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In patients treated with IS drugs, the rate of postoperative recurrence after second ileocolonic CD resection is lower than in untreated patients. Our results suggest that IS drugs should be evaluated prospectively for prevention of second postoperative CD recurrence. Copyright 2004 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors: Martin H Holtmann; Frank Krummenauer; Christina Claas; Kristina Kremeyer; Dirk Lorenz; Olivia Rainer; Iris Vogel; Ulrich Böcker; Stephan Böhm; Carsten Büning; Rainer Duchmann; Guido Gerken; Hans Herfarth; Norbert Lügering; Wolfgang Kruis; Max Reinshagen; Jan Schmidt; Andreas Stallmach; Jürgen Stein; Andreas Sturm; Peter R Galle; Daan W Hommes; Geert D'Haens; Paul Rutgeerts; Markus F Neurath Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2009-06-10 Impact factor: 3.199