Literature DB >> 15472496

The second progress report on the Hypertension Objective treatment based on Measurement by Electrical Devices of Blood Pressure (HOMED-BP) study.

Shin Saito1, Kei Asayama, Takayoshi Ohkubo, Masahiro Kikuya, Hirohito Metoki, Taku Obara, Junichiro Hashimoto, Kazuhito Totsune, Yukio Miura, Yutaka Imai.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Hypertension Objective treatment based on Measurement by Electrical Devices of Blood Pressure (HOMED-BP) study is a large-scale intervention trial to determine both optimal target blood pressure (BP) on the basis of self-measured BP at home, and optimal initial antihypertensive medication.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the quality of randomization at the end of March 2003, and BP-controlled conditions during initial 6 months.
METHODS: We evaluated the number of patients randomized by the end of March 2003, and BP changes during the initial 6 months based on intention-to-treat analysis.
RESULTS: By the end of March 2003, a total of 1086 patients (12% of a planned randomization of 9000 patients) had been randomized. Among 653 patients who had been followed for > or =6 months after randomization, mean systolic/diastolic BPs at randomization in the calcium antagonist, angiotensin-converting enzyme and angiotensin II receptor blocker groups were 149/89, 150/89 and 149/88 mmHg, respectively. Blood pressures were reduced after 3 months (137/83, 139/82 and 136/82 mmHg, respectively), and further reduced after 6 months (134/81, 135/80 and 133/80 mmHg, respectively), with no significant differences identified between groups. In more- and less-intensive BP-lowering groups, mean systolic/diastolic BPs at randomization were 149/88 and 150/89 mmHg, respectively. Although BPs were reduced after treatment for 3 months (137/83 and 137/82 mmHg, respectively) and 6 months (134/80 and 135/80 mmHg, respectively) in each target group, significant differences were still not observed between groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Good quality of randomization was observed at the end of March 2003, but rate of achievement for target BPs was insufficient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15472496     DOI: 10.1097/00126097-200410000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Press Monit        ISSN: 1359-5237            Impact factor:   1.444


  2 in total

Review 1.  Updated report on comparative effectiveness of ACE inhibitors, ARBs, and direct renin inhibitors for patients with essential hypertension: much more data, little new information.

Authors:  Benjamin J Powers; Remy R Coeytaux; Rowena J Dolor; Vic Hasselblad; Uptal D Patel; William S Yancy; Rebecca N Gray; R Julian Irvine; Amy S Kendrick; Gillian D Sanders
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Italian society of hypertension guidelines for conventional and automated blood pressure measurement in the office, at home and over 24 hours.

Authors:  Gianfranco Parati; Stefano Omboni; Paolo Palatini; Damiano Rizzoni; Grzegorz Bilo; Mariaconsuelo Valentini; Enrico Agabiti Rosei; Giuseppe Mancia
Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev       Date:  2013-01-22
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.