Literature DB >> 15472027

The energy cost of loaded flight is substantially lower than expected due to alterations in flight kinematics.

C Hambly1, E J Harper, J R Speakman.   

Abstract

The effect of experimentally increased wing loading on the energy cost of flight was examined in cockatiels Nyphicus hollandicus. Five individuals were flown for periods of approximately 2 min, while carrying additional payload mass amounting to between 5 and 20% of unloaded body mass. The energy cost of flight was measured using the 13C-labelled bicarbonate technique, which was also calibrated in a separate experiment on resting birds, by comparing the elimination rate of 13C in breath with a simultaneous measurement of oxygen consumption by indirect calorimetry. It was not possible to perform a similar calibration during flight when energy costs were higher, so we extrapolated the relationship from the resting calibration to predict flight cost. Flight cost in the pre-manipulated individuals averaged 16.7+/-1.8 W. Flight cost in the pre-manipulated birds was significantly related to the interaction between downstroke duration and flight speed. There was no significant increase in flight cost with increases in payload mass. The birds responded to payload masses between 5 and 15% of their unloaded body mass by decreasing flight speed relative to unloaded birds, while maintaining wing beat frequency (Fb). At a payload mass equivalent to 20% of body mass, however, the birds flew at higher speeds than unloaded controls, and had a significantly higher Fb, generated by a reduction in both the upstroke and downstroke durations. Wing amplitude was unaffected by the increase in loading. Using the measured flight parameters, the effect of loading was not significantly different than predicted using aerodynamic models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15472027     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.01234

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  8 in total

1.  Metabolic costs of avian flight in relation to flight velocity: a study in Rose Coloured Starlings (Sturnus roseus, Linnaeus).

Authors:  Sophia Engel; Herbert Biebach; G Henk Visser
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2006-01-20       Impact factor: 2.200

2.  Perch-hunting in insectivorous Rhinolophus bats is related to the high energy costs of manoeuvring in flight.

Authors:  Christian C Voigt; B-Markus Schuller; Stefan Greif; Björn M Siemers
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 2.200

3.  High manoeuvring costs force narrow-winged molossid bats to forage in open space.

Authors:  Christian C Voigt; Marc W Holderied
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 2.200

4.  Energy expenditure during flight in relation to body mass: effects of natural increases in mass and artificial load in Rose Coloured Starlings.

Authors:  Carola A Schmidt-Wellenburg; Sophia Engel; G Henk Visser
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 2.200

5.  Kinematic plasticity during flight in fruit bats: individual variability in response to loading.

Authors:  Jose Iriarte-Diaz; Daniel K Riskin; Kenneth S Breuer; Sharon M Swartz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata) shift toward aerodynamically efficient flight kinematics in response to an artificial load.

Authors:  Anthony B Lapsansky; Jennifer A Igoe; Bret W Tobalske
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 2.422

7.  Measuring energy metabolism in the mouse - theoretical, practical, and analytical considerations.

Authors:  John R Speakman
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 4.566

8.  Flight is the key to postprandial blood glucose balance in the fruit bats Eonycteris spelaea and Cynopterus sphinx.

Authors:  Xingwen Peng; Xiangyang He; Qi Liu; Yunxiao Sun; Hui Liu; Qin Zhang; Jie Liang; Zhen Peng; Zhixiao Liu; Libiao Zhang
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 2.912

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.