Literature DB >> 15471831

Clinical usefulness of 18F-FDG PET in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with questionable MRI findings for recurrence.

Shu-Hang Ng1, Chang Tung-Chieh Joseph, Sheng-Chieh Chan, Sheung-Fat Ko, Hung-Ming Wang, Chun-Ta Liao, Yu-Chen Chang, Wuu-Jyh Lin, Ying-Kai Fu, Tzu-Chen Yen.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: It has been reported that 18F-FDG PET is highly sensitive for the detection of recurrent head-and-neck cancer. The objective of our prospective study was to validate the ability of this technique to detect the presence of tumors in primary, nodal, and distant sites as well as to assess its overall clinical usefulness in patients with questionable MRI findings for residual or recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).
METHODS: From January 2002 to October 2003, a group of 37 NPC patients whose postradiation follow-up MRI examination showed questionable residual or recurrent disease was assessed with 18F-FDG PET. 18F-FDG PET was interpreted visually. Disease at primary, nodal, and distant sites was assessed. The final diagnosis was confirmed histopathologically or with clinical and imaging follow-up of at least 6 mo.
RESULTS: Our results showed that the sensitivity and specificity of 18F-FDG PET for the detection of recurrent NPC were 91.6% and 76.0%, respectively, at the primary site; 90.0% and 88.9%, respectively, at nodal sites; and 100% and 90.6%, respectively, at distant sites. The overall sensitivity and specificity were 89.5% and 55.6%, respectively. Among the 37 patients, 18F-FDG PET added significant information to the MRI findings in 18, including offering true-negative findings in 10, revealing unexpected small metastatic adenopathy in 3, and disclosing distant metastatic foci in 5.
CONCLUSION: 18F-FDG PET is highly sensitive and moderately specific for the detection of recurrent NPC in patients with questionable MRI findings. Overall, 18F-FDG PET appears to add significant information to MRI findings in about half of the NPC patients whose MRI examination shows questionable tumor recurrence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15471831

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  10 in total

1.  Advantages and pitfalls of 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography in detecting locally residual or recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Sheng-Chieh Chan; Shu-Hang Ng; Joseph Tung-Chieh Chang; Chien-Yu Lin; Yen-Chao Chen; Yu-Chen Chang; Cheng-Lung Hsu; Hung-Ming Wang; Chun-Ta Liao; Tzu-Chen Yen
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  Meta-analysis of diagnostic value of 18F-FDG PET or PET/CT for detecting lymph node and distant metastases in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  G Shen; W Zhang; Z Jia; J Li; Q Wang; H Deng
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Comprehensive imaging of residual/ recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma using whole-body MRI at 3 T compared with FDG-PET-CT.

Authors:  Shu-Hang Ng; Sheng-Chieh Chan; Tzu-Chen Yen; Chun-Ta Liao; Joseph Tung-Chieh Chang; Sheung-Fat Ko; Hung-Ming Wang; Chin-Yu Lin; Kai-Ping Chang; Yu-Chun Lin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  A head-to-head comparison of 68Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 and 18F-FDG PET/MR in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a prospective study.

Authors:  Chunxia Qin; Fang Liu; Jing Huang; Weiwei Ruan; Qingyao Liu; Yongkang Gai; Fan Hu; Dawei Jiang; Yu Hu; Kunyu Yang; Xiaoli Lan
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-02-20       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Head-to-head comparison between 18F-FDOPA PET/CT and MR/CT angiography in clinically recurrent head and neck paragangliomas.

Authors:  Céline Heimburger; Francis Veillon; David Taïeb; Bernard Goichot; Sophie Riehm; Julie Petit-Thomas; Gerlinde Averous; Marcela Cavalcanti; Fabrice Hubelé; Gerard Chabrier; Izzie Jacques Namer; Anne Charpiot; Alessio Imperiale
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 6.  Current treatment options for recurrent nasopharyngeal cancer.

Authors:  Carlos Suárez; Juan P Rodrigo; Alessandra Rinaldo; Johannes A Langendijk; Ashok R Shaha; Alfio Ferlito
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Early detection of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Keiji Tabuchi; Masahiro Nakayama; Bungo Nishimura; Kentaro Hayashi; Akira Hara
Journal:  Int J Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-06-08

8.  The clinical utility of FDG PET/CT among solid organ transplant recipients suspected of malignancy or infection.

Authors:  Neval E Wareham; J D Lundgren; C Da Cunha-Bang; F Gustafsson; M Iversen; H H Johannesen; A Kjær; A Rasmussen; H Sengeløv; S S Sørensen; B M Fischer
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-11-12       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 9.  Surveillance tools for detection of recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma: An evidence-based review and recommendations.

Authors:  Andrew Thamboo; Kim H Tran; Annette X Ye; Issraa Shoucair; Basel Jabarin; Eitan Prisman; Cathie Garnis
Journal:  World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2022-04-21

10.  Clinical significance of the post-radiotherapy 18F-fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography response in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Yuri Jeong; In-Hye Jung; Jae Seung Kim; Sei Kyung Chang; Sang-Wook Lee
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 3.039

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.