Literature DB >> 15471802

Energy value of pig feeds: effect of pig body weight and energy evaluation system.

J Noblet1, J van Milgen.   

Abstract

Ad libitum energy intake and performance in pigs depends on many animal and environmental factors in which feed energy density plays an important role. In addition, feed represents an important cost in pig production, and energy represents the greatest proportion of this cost. It is therefore important to express the feed energy value on an appropriate basis, and both energy supply (a dietary characteristic) and energy requirement (an animal characteristic) should be expressed using the same system. Energy content depends first on the nutrient composition; the constituents differ markedly in GE content (23.0, 39.0, 17.4, and 18.4 kJ/g for CP, fat, starch, and dietary fiber, respectively). Due to differences in digestibility and associated endogenous energy losses, the actual contribution of nutrients to apparent DE supply in growing pigs is even more variable and ranges from 31.7 kJ/g for fat, 22.4 kJ/g for CP, 17.2 kJ/g for starch, to only 3.2 kJ/g for dietary fiber. Nutrient composition also affects the efficiency of conversion of ME to NE, which varies from 90% for fat to 82% for starch and 60% for CP. Consequently, the energy values (relative to a conventional diet containing 14.2, 13.6, and 10.3 MJ/kg of DE, ME, and NE, respectively) of corn, soybean meal, and animal fat are 100, 104, and 235 on a DE basis; 102, 99, and 244 on a ME basis; and 107, 79, and 289 on a NE basis. Energy value thus depends on the system of evaluation. The energy density of pig feeds can also be affected by feed processing. For example, pelleting markedly increases fat and energy digestibilities in corn or full-fat rapeseed. Also the animal itself can affect the energy value of nutrients; digestion of dietary fiber becomes more efficient with increasing BW, with subsequent differences in energy content of feeds according to BW. In conclusion, a satisfactory characterization of the energy value of feeds should be based on their NE content. Factors affecting nutrients digestibility (e.g., BW and feed processing) should also be taken into account.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15471802     DOI: 10.2527/2004.8213_supplE229x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  26 in total

1.  Net energy content of rice bran, defatted rice bran, corn gluten feed, and corn germ meal fed to growing pigs using indirect calorimetry.

Authors:  Zhiqian Lyu; Yakui Li; Hu Liu; Enkai Li; Peili Li; Shuai Zhang; Fenglai Wang; Changhua Lai
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Available energy and amino acid digestibility of defatted rice bran fed to growing pigs.

Authors:  Bingbing Huang; Chengfei Huang; Zhiqian Lyu; Yifan Chen; Peili Li; Ling Liu; Changhua Lai
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-07-28       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Available energy and amino acid digestibility of yellow dent corn fed to growing pigs1.

Authors:  Zhiqian Lyu; Quanfeng Li; Shuai Zhang; Changhua Lai; Chengfei Huang
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  In growing pigs, nutritive value and nutrient digestibility of distillers' by-products obtained from two varieties of rice.

Authors:  Nguyen Cong Oanh; Pham Kim Dang; Jérôme Bindelle; Vu Dinh Ton; Jean-Luc Hornick
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 1.559

Review 5.  Effects of dietary fatty acids on gut health and function of pigs pre- and post-weaning.

Authors:  Charlotte Lauridsen
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 6.  Measures Matter-Determining the True Nutri-Physiological Value of Feed Ingredients for Swine.

Authors:  Gerald C Shurson; Yuan-Tai Hung; Jae Cheol Jang; Pedro E Urriola
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  The Interaction Between Dietary Valine and Tryptophan Content and Their Effect on the Performance of Piglets.

Authors:  Sam Millet
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 8.  Feed energy evaluation for growing pigs.

Authors:  D Y Kil; B G Kim; H H Stein
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.509

9.  Evaluation of energy values of high-fiber dietary ingredients with different solubility fed to growing pigs using the difference and regression methods.

Authors:  Zhengqun Liu; Ruqing Zhong; Kai Li; Liang Chen; Bifeng Zhang; Lei Liu; Hongfu Zhang
Journal:  Anim Nutr       Date:  2021-04-20

10.  A review of feed efficiency in swine: biology and application.

Authors:  John F Patience; Mariana C Rossoni-Serão; Néstor A Gutiérrez
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2015-08-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.