Literature DB >> 15471791

Management to reduce nitrogen losses in animal production.

C A Rotz1.   

Abstract

Reduction of nitrogen loss in animal production requires whole-farm management. Reduced loss from one farm component is easily negated in another if all components are not equally well managed. Animal excretion of manure N can be decreased by improving the balance of protein or amino acids fed to that required by individual animals or animal groups or by improving production efficiency. Management to increase milk, meat, or egg production normally improves efficiency by reducing the maintenance protein required per unit of production. Large losses of manure nitrogen occur through the ammonia and nitrous oxide that are emitted into the atmosphere and the nitrate leached into groundwater. Up to half of the excreted nitrogen is lost from the housing facility, but this loss can be decreased through frequent manure removal and by avoiding deep litter systems and feedlots. Techniques such as acid treatment of manure, scrubbing of ventilation air, and floor designs for separating feces and urine substantially reduce ammonia emissions, but these practices are often impractical or uneconomical for general use. Manure storage units improve nutrient utilization by allowing better timing of nutrient application with crop needs. At least 70% of the nitrogen entering anaerobic lagoons is typically lost, but a less than 10% loss can be maintained using slurry storage with a natural crust or other cover, or by drying poultry manure to at least 50% dry matter. Irrigation and surface spreading of manure without soil incorporation often ensures the loss of all remaining nonorganic nitrogen (typically, 20 to 40% of remaining nitrogen). Rapid incorporation and shallow injection methods decrease this loss by at least 50%, and deep injection into the soil essentially eliminates this loss. For grazing animals, excessive loss can be avoided by not overstocking pastures and avoiding late fall and winter grazing. Reducing emissions between the animal and the soil can lead to greater leaching and denitrification losses from the soil if this additional nitrogen is not used properly. The use of a crop rotation that efficiently absorbs these nutrients and applying nitrogen near the time it is needed by crops reduce the potential for further loss. Maintaining the proper number of animals per unit of land available for manure application is always crucial for efficient recycling of nitrogen. Our understanding of nitrogen loss processes is improved through modeling, and computer models assist in the development of integrated systems for efficient and economical nitrogen use in animal production.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15471791     DOI: 10.2527/2004.8213_supplE119x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  13 in total

1.  Effects of prolonged consumption of water with elevated nitrate levels on certain metabolic parameters of dairy cattle and use of clinoptilolite for their amelioration.

Authors:  P D Katsoulos; M A Karatzia; Z Polizopoulou; P Florou-Paneri; H Karatzias
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  The sustainability of changes in agricultural technology: The carbon, economic and labour implications of mechanisation and synthetic fertiliser use.

Authors:  Alfred Gathorne-Hardy
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 5.129

3.  Effects of inclusion of licorice (Glycyrrhiza glabra L.) leaves, a tannin-containing plant, in a low-protein diet on feedlot performance and carcass characteristics of fat-tailed lambs.

Authors:  Mohammad Javad Zamiri; Hossein Rajaei Sharifabadi; Amir Sajjad Bagheri; Amanollah Solhjoo
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 1.559

4.  Exploring a Possible Link between the Intestinal Microbiota and Feed Efficiency in Pigs.

Authors:  Ursula M McCormack; Tânia Curião; Stefan G Buzoianu; Maria L Prieto; Tomas Ryan; Patrick Varley; Fiona Crispie; Elizabeth Magowan; Barbara U Metzler-Zebeli; Donagh Berry; Orla O'Sullivan; Paul D Cotter; Gillian E Gardiner; Peadar G Lawlor
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Spatial and temporal trend of Chinese manure nutrient pollution and assimilation capacity of cropland and grassland.

Authors:  Wei Ouyang; Fanghua Hao; Xinfeng Wei; Haobo Huang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-01-20       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  The environmental impact of recombinant bovine somatotropin (rbST) use in dairy production.

Authors:  Judith L Capper; Euridice Castañeda-Gutiérrez; Roger A Cady; Dale E Bauman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Ammonia in the atmosphere: a review on emission sources, atmospheric chemistry and deposition on terrestrial bodies.

Authors:  Sailesh N Behera; Mukesh Sharma; Viney P Aneja; Rajasekhar Balasubramanian
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 4.223

8.  Reducing Wet Ammonium Deposition in Rocky Mountain National Park: the Development and Evaluation of A Pilot Early Warning System for Agricultural Operations in Eastern Colorado.

Authors:  Aaron J Piña; Russ S Schumacher; A Scott Denning; William B Faulkner; Jill S Baron; Jay Ham; Dennis S Ojima; Jeffrey L Collett
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 3.266

9.  Nitrogen budget in a lowland coastal area within the Po River basin (northern Italy): multiple evidences of equilibrium between sources and internal sinks.

Authors:  Giuseppe Castaldelli; Elisa Soana; Erica Racchetti; Enrica Pierobon; Micol Mastrocicco; Enrico Tesini; Elisa Anna Fano; Marco Bartoli
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 3.266

10.  Environmental effectiveness of swine sewage management: a multicriteria AHP-based model for a reliable quick assessment.

Authors:  Marco Vizzari; Giuseppe Modica
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2013-08-24       Impact factor: 3.266

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.