Literature DB >> 15471653

Morphine for dyspnea control in terminal cancer patients: is it appropriate in Taiwan?

Wen-Yu Hu1, Tai-Yuan Chiu, Shao-Yi Cheng, Ching-Yu Chen.   

Abstract

Morphine for dyspnea control usually arouses ethical controversy in terminal cancer care. This study prospectively assessed the use of morphine for dyspnea control in terminal cancer patients in terms of two characteristics: the extent to which medical staff, family, and patients found morphine to be ethically acceptable and efficacious, and the influence of morphine on survival. One hundred and thirty-six palliative care patients meeting specific eligibility criteria were enrolled. A structured data collection form was used daily to evaluate clinical conditions, which were analyzed at the time of admission and 48 h before death. Sixty-six (48.6%) of the 136 patients had dyspnea on admission. The intensity was mild in 14.0% and moderate or severe in 34.6%. The intensity of dyspnea became worse 48 h before death (4.29+/-2.55 vs. 4.94+/-2.60, P < 0.001, range 0-10). Twenty-seven (40.9%) of 66 patients with dyspnea received morphine on admission for the control of dyspnea; the routes of administration were oral (59.3%) and subcutaneous (40.7%). Fewer than two-thirds (59.3%) of the patients were given morphine with the consent of both patient and family. More than one-third (40.7%) on admission and about one-half (52.8%) in the 48 h before death had the consent of family alone. Positive ethical acceptability and satisfaction with using morphine for dyspnea control were found in both medical staff and family in this study. Multiple Cox regression analysis showed that using morphine for dyspnea, both on admission and in the 48 h before death, did not significantly influence the patients' survival (HR: 0.015, 95% CI: 0.00-4.23; HR: 1.76, 95% CI: 0.73-4.24). In this population, the use of morphine for dyspnea control in the terminal phase of cancer was effective and ethically validated in the study. Research efforts to find the most appropriate route and dosage of morphine for dyspnea, based on the patient's situation, remain worthwhile.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15471653     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2004.01.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage        ISSN: 0885-3924            Impact factor:   3.612


  3 in total

1.  Killing the symptom without killing the patient.

Authors:  Romayne Gallagher
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Certain bio-psychosocial-spiritual problems associated with dyspnea among advanced cancer patients in Taiwan.

Authors:  Chih-Te Ho; Hua-Shui Hsu; Chia-Ing Li; Chiu-Shong Liu; Chin-Yu Lin; Cheng-Chieh Lin; Wen-Yuan Lin
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  The relationship between pain management and psychospiritual distress in patients with advanced cancer following admission to a palliative care unit.

Authors:  Ya-Ping Lee; Chih-Hsun Wu; Tai-Yuan Chiu; Ching-Yu Chen; Tatsuya Morita; Shou-Hung Hung; Sin-Bao Huang; Chia-Sheng Kuo; Jaw-Shiun Tsai
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 3.234

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.