OBJECTIVE: To characterize amniotic pressure (AP) in pregnancies with normal amniotic fluid volume. DESIGN: Observational study, mainly cross-sectional. SETTING: Fetal medicine unit within a tertiary referral hospital. SUBJECTS: Patients undergoing transamniotic invasive procedures in whom amniotic fluid volume was subjectively assessed as normal on ultrasound. Those beyond 16 weeks with a deepest vertical pool on ultrasound less than 3.0 or greater than 8.0 cm were excluded. Overall 194 pregnancies were studied on 232 occasions between 7 and 38 weeks gestation. INTERVENTIONS: Manometry readings referenced to the top of the maternal abdomen were obtained via a fluid-filled line from the needle hub and either connected to a pressure transducer (n = 190) or held vertically against a ruler (n = 42). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: AP in mm Hg, AP corrected for gestational age (z scores), semi-quantitative ultrasonic indices of amniotic fluid volume, clinical variables. RESULTS: AP in singleton pregnancies increased with advancing gestation (P less than 0.001), and the sigmoid-shaped regression curve plateaued in the mid-trimester. AP z scores were not influenced by volume-related phenomena such as twin gestation, the deepest vertical pool, or amniotic fluid index, nor by maternal age, parity, gravidity, fetal sex, or subsequent spontaneous preterm delivery. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that AP is not principally determined by intrauterine volume. We speculate that AP, which reflects change in uterine tension as a function of radius, may instead be determined by gestation-specific anatomical and hormonal influences on gravid uterine musculature. A reference range for AP has been constructed for use in amnioinfusion and amnioreduction procedures.
OBJECTIVE: To characterize amniotic pressure (AP) in pregnancies with normal amniotic fluid volume. DESIGN: Observational study, mainly cross-sectional. SETTING: Fetal medicine unit within a tertiary referral hospital. SUBJECTS:Patients undergoing transamniotic invasive procedures in whom amniotic fluid volume was subjectively assessed as normal on ultrasound. Those beyond 16 weeks with a deepest vertical pool on ultrasound less than 3.0 or greater than 8.0 cm were excluded. Overall 194 pregnancies were studied on 232 occasions between 7 and 38 weeks gestation. INTERVENTIONS: Manometry readings referenced to the top of the maternal abdomen were obtained via a fluid-filled line from the needle hub and either connected to a pressure transducer (n = 190) or held vertically against a ruler (n = 42). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: AP in mm Hg, AP corrected for gestational age (z scores), semi-quantitative ultrasonic indices of amniotic fluid volume, clinical variables. RESULTS: AP in singleton pregnancies increased with advancing gestation (P less than 0.001), and the sigmoid-shaped regression curve plateaued in the mid-trimester. AP z scores were not influenced by volume-related phenomena such as twin gestation, the deepest vertical pool, or amniotic fluid index, nor by maternal age, parity, gravidity, fetal sex, or subsequent spontaneous preterm delivery. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that AP is not principally determined by intrauterine volume. We speculate that AP, which reflects change in uterine tension as a function of radius, may instead be determined by gestation-specific anatomical and hormonal influences on gravid uterine musculature. A reference range for AP has been constructed for use in amnioinfusion and amnioreduction procedures.
Authors: Andrea R Westervelt; Michael Fernandez; Michael House; Joy Vink; Chia-Ling Nhan-Chang; Ronald Wapner; Kristin M Myers Journal: J Biomech Eng Date: 2017-05-01 Impact factor: 2.097
Authors: Kristina M Adams Waldorf; Natasha Singh; Aarthi R Mohan; Roger C Young; Lisa Ngo; Ananya Das; Jesse Tsai; Aasthaa Bansal; Louis Paolella; Bronwen R Herbert; Suren R Sooranna; G Michael Gough; Cliff Astley; Keith Vogel; Audrey E Baldessari; Theodor K Bammler; James MacDonald; Michael G Gravett; Lakshmi Rajagopal; Mark R Johnson Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2015-08-15 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Peter Sokolowski; Francis Saison; Warwick Giles; Shaun McGrath; David Smith; Julia Smith; Roger Smith Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-06-23 Impact factor: 3.240