Literature DB >> 15471559

Promoter hypermethylation of DAP-kinase is associated with poor survival in primary biliary tract carcinoma patients.

Tomohiro Tozawa1, Gen Tamura, Teiichiro Honda, Shin-ichi Nawata, Wataru Kimura, Naohiko Makino, Sumio Kawata, Tamotsu Sugai, Takayuki Suto, Teiichi Motoyama.   

Abstract

To clarify the clinicopathological significance of promoter hypermethylation of tumor suppressor and tumor-related genes in biliary tract carcinomas, we examined the promoter methylation status of multiple genes in primary biliary tract carcinomas. These consisted of carcinomas of the bile duct, gallbladder, and duodenal ampulla. Surgical specimens were obtained from a total of 37 patients with biliary tract carcinoma. The cohort consisted of 23 patients with bile duct carcinoma, 9 patients with gallbladder carcinoma, and 5 patients with ampullary carcinoma. The methylation status of CHFR, DAP-kinase, E-cadherin, hMLH1, p16, RASSF1A, and RUNX3 was examined by methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (MSP). The correlation between methylation status and clinicopathological characteristics was then assessed. The methylation frequencies of CHFR, DAP-kinase, E-cadherin, hMLH1, p16, RASSF1A, and RUNX3 genes were 16.2%, 21.4%, 27.0%, 8.1%, 24.3%, 27.0%, and 56.8%, respectively, in primary biliary tract carcinomas. The number of methylated genes per sample was 2.17 +/- 0.28 (average +/- SD) in bile duct carcinomas, 1.80 +/- 0.97 in ampullary carcinomas, and 0.89 +/- 0.35 in gallbladder carcinomas, with a statistically significant difference between bile duct carcinomas and gallbladder carcinomas (P = 0.02). As for clinicopathological significance, patients with a methylated RUNX3 promoter were significantly older than those with unmethylated RUNX3 (P = 0.01), and DAP-kinase methylation was more frequent in poorly differentiated tumors than in well to moderately differentiated ones (P = 0.04). The overall survival rate was significantly lower in patients with methylated DAP-kinase (P = 0.009) or RUNX3 (P = 0.034) compared to those with unmethylated genes. Furthermore, DAP-kinase methylation-positive status was independently associated with poor survival in multivariate analyses (hazard ratio = 8.71, P = 0.024). A significant proportion of primary biliary tract carcinomas exhibited promoter hypermethylation of tumor suppressor and tumor-related genes, although bile duct carcinomas are more prone to being affected by promoter methylation than are gallbladder carcinomas. Hypermethylation of DAP-kinase appears to be a significant prognostic factor in primary biliary tract carcinomas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15471559     DOI: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2004.tb03254.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Sci        ISSN: 1347-9032            Impact factor:   6.716


  17 in total

1.  Early involvement of death-associated protein kinase promoter hypermethylation in the carcinogenesis of Barrett's esophageal adenocarcinoma and its association with clinical progression.

Authors:  Doerthe Kuester; Altaf A Dar; Christopher C Moskaluk; Sabine Krueger; Frank Meyer; Roland Hartig; Manfred Stolte; Peter Malfertheiner; Hans Lippert; Albert Roessner; Wael El-Rifai; Regine Schneider-Stock
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.715

2.  Prognostic significance of epigenetic inactivation of p16, p15, MGMT and DAPK genes in follicular lymphoma.

Authors:  Milena Krajnović; Milica Radojković; Radoslav Davidović; Bogomir Dimitrijević; Koviljka Krtolica
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2012-12-30       Impact factor: 3.064

3.  Serum metabolome profiles characterized by patients with hepatocellular carcinoma associated with hepatitis B and C.

Authors:  Takafumi Saito; Masahiro Sugimoto; Kazuo Okumoto; Hiroaki Haga; Tomohiro Katsumi; Kei Mizuno; Taketo Nishina; Sonoko Sato; Kaori Igarashi; Hiroko Maki; Masaru Tomita; Yoshiyuki Ueno; Tomoyoshi Soga
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Signaling pathways as therapeutic targets in biliary tract cancer.

Authors:  Jennifer Yang; Matthew R Farren; Daniel Ahn; Tanios Bekaii-Saab; Gregory B Lesinski
Journal:  Expert Opin Ther Targets       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 6.902

Review 5.  The significance of genetics for cholangiocarcinoma development.

Authors:  Luca Maroni; Irene Pierantonelli; Jesus M Banales; Antonio Benedetti; Marco Marzioni
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2013-10

6.  Promoter methylation profile in gallbladder cancer.

Authors:  Juan Carlos Roa; Leonardo Anabalón; Iván Roa; Angélica Melo; Juan Carlos Araya; Oscar Tapia; Xavier de Aretxabala; Sergio Muñoz; Barbara Schneider
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 7.527

7.  Suppressing effects of down-regulating DNMT1 and DNMT3b expression on the growth of human cholangiocarcinoma cell line.

Authors:  Shi Zuo; Jian Luo; Minfeng Liu; Lining Xu; Jingqing Dong; Wei Guo; Shengquan Zou
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2008-06-19

Review 8.  Epigenetic DNA hypermethylation in cholangiocarcinoma: potential roles in pathogenesis, diagnosis and identification of treatment targets.

Authors:  Dalbir S Sandhu; Abdirashid M Shire; Lewis R Roberts
Journal:  Liver Int       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 5.828

9.  CHFR: A Novel Mitotic Checkpoint Protein and Regulator of Tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Lisa M Privette; Elizabeth M Petty
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 4.243

10.  Two distinct pathways of p16 gene inactivation in gallbladder cancer.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Tadokoro; Takako Shigihara; Tomomi Ikeda; Masaru Takase; Masafumi Suyama
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.