Literature DB >> 15471104

Amalgam studies: disregarding basic principles of mercury toxicity.

J Mutter1, J Naumann, C Sadaghiani, H Walach, G Drasch.   

Abstract

Dental amalgam, which has been used for over 150 years in dental practice, consists of about 50% metallic mercury. Studies on animal and humans show that mercury is continuously released from dental amalgam and absorbed by several body tissues. It is widely accepted that the main source of mercury vapor is dental amalgam and it contributes substantially to mercury load in human body tissues. There is still a controversy about the consequences of this additional mercury exposure from amalgam to human health. Many studies were performed to evaluate possible adverse effects. In this comment, these studies were analyzed with regard to their methodical quality by considering the newest findings on mercury toxicity and metabolism. In sum, a number of studies are methodically flawed drawing inaccurate conclusions as to the safety of dental amalgam.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15471104     DOI: 10.1078/1438-4639-00305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health        ISSN: 1438-4639            Impact factor:   5.840


  10 in total

1.  Dependence of kinetic variables in the short-term release of Hg2+, Cu2+ and Zn2+ ions into synthetic saliva from an high-copper dental amalgam.

Authors:  Guglielmo Campus; Franklin Garcia-Godoy; Leonardo Gaspa; Angelo Panzanelli; Paola C Piu; Giovanni Micera; Pierfranca Lugliè; Gavino Sanna
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-03-27       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Low Prevalence of Amalgam-Associated Lichenoid Lesions in the Oral Cavity: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Pankaj Gupta; Shivani Mallishery; Nikita Bajaj; K Banga; Ashna Mehra; Rajiv Desai
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-02-28

3.  The role of intracellular glutathione in inorganic mercury-induced toxicity in neuroblastoma cells.

Authors:  Alan Becker; Karam F A Soliman
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2009-04-04       Impact factor: 3.996

4.  Psychological symptoms and self-image of patients with complaints attributed to dental restorative materials.

Authors:  Lena Mårell; Jan Bergdahl; Anders Tillberg; Berndt Stenberg; Anders Berglund
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-10-27       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Increased Zn/Glutathione Levels and Higher Superoxide Dismutase-1 Activity as Biomarkers of Oxidative Stress in Women with Long-Term Dental Amalgam Fillings: Correlation between Mercury/Aluminium Levels (in Hair) and Antioxidant Systems in Plasma.

Authors:  María Eugenia Cabaña-Muñoz; José María Parmigiani-Izquierdo; Luis Alberto Bravo-González; Hee-Moon Kyung; José Joaquín Merino
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Allergological and toxicological aspects in a multiple chemical sensitivity cohort.

Authors:  Paolo D Pigatto; Claudio Minoia; Anna Ronchi; Lucia Brambilla; Silvia M Ferrucci; Francesco Spadari; Manuela Passoni; Francesco Somalvico; Gian Paolo Bombeccari; Gianpaolo Guzzi
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 6.543

7.  A Turn-On Fluorescence-Based Fibre Optic Sensor for the Detection of Mercury.

Authors:  T Hien Nguyen; Tong Sun; Kenneth T V Grattan
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  Occupational and environmental mercury exposure and human reproductive health - a review.

Authors:  Sunil Kumar; Anupama Sharma; Sapna Sedha
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2022-09-05

Review 9.  New science challenges old notion that mercury dental amalgam is safe.

Authors:  Kristin G Homme; Janet K Kern; Boyd E Haley; David A Geier; Paul G King; Lisa K Sykes; Mark R Geier
Journal:  Biometals       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 2.949

10.  Uptake, efflux, and toxicity of inorganic and methyl mercury in the endothelial cells (EA.hy926).

Authors:  Songnian Liu; Martin Tsz-Ki Tsui; Elizabeth Lee; Josh Fowler; Zhenquan Jia
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.