Literature DB >> 15471020

An "all 5-mm ports" selective approach to laparoscopic cholecystectomy, appendectomy, and anti-reflux surgery.

Yesar El-Dhuwaib1, Ayman M Hamade, M Eyad Issa, Basel M Balbisi, Ghalib Abid, Basil J Ammori.   

Abstract

Laparoscopic appendectomy, cholecystectomy, or anti-reflux procedures are conventionally performed with the use of one and often two 10/12-mm ports. While needlescopic or micropuncture laparoscopic procedures reduce postoperative pain, they invariably involve the use of one 10/12-mm port and the instruments applied have their ergo-dynamic shortcomings. Between September 2002 and March 2003, we have attempted an "all 5-mm ports" approach in 49 laparoscopic procedures, which included 18 of 59 laparoscopic cholecystectomies (31%), 26 diagnostic laparoscopies for suspected appendicitis (of which we proceeded to a laparoscopic appendectomy in 17 patients), and in the last 5 of 9 laparoscopic Nissen fundoplications. Conversion of one of the 5-mm ports to a 10-mm port was required in 5 of the 18 (28%) laparoscopic cholecystectomies and in 6 of the 17 (35%) laparoscopic appendectomies to facilitate organ retrieval in patients with large gallstones (>5 mm in diameter) and in obese patients with fatty mesoappendix. There were no conversions to open surgery. No significant differences in the operating time between the laparoscopic procedures performed by the all 5-mm ports approach or the conventional approach were observed. No intraoperative or postoperative complications occurred in this series. The "all 5-mm ports" approach to laparoscopic cholecystectomy and appendectomy in selected patients and to laparoscopic fundoplication appears feasible and safe. A randomised comparison between this approach and the conventional laparoscopic approach to elective cholecystectomy and fundoplication in which two of the ports employed are of the 10-mm diameter is warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15471020     DOI: 10.1097/01.sle.0000129399.95866.5b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech        ISSN: 1530-4515            Impact factor:   1.719


  6 in total

1.  Is there still any role for minilaparoscopic-cholecystectomy? A general surgeons' last five years experience over 932 cases.

Authors:  Ferdinando Agresta; Natalino Bedin
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2011-11-11

2.  SAGES guideline for laparoscopic appendectomy.

Authors:  James R Korndorffer; Erika Fellinger; William Reed
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Twenty years after Erich Muhe: Persisting controversies with the gold standard of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Kalpesh Jani; P S Rajan; K Sendhilkumar; C Palanivelu
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.407

4.  Fixity of ports to the abdominal wall during laparoscopic surgery: a randomized comparison of cutting versus blunt trocars.

Authors:  A M Hamade; M E Issa; K R Haylett; B J Ammori
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-02-08       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined using miniaturised instruments in transgastric gall bladder removal: performed on 63 patients.

Authors:  Florent Jurczak; Jean-Paul Pousset
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2010-01-28

6.  Suprapubic Cholecystectomy Improves Cosmetic Outcome Compared to Classic Cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Anas Taha; Stephanie Taha-Mehlitz; Ulrich Sternkopf; Elena Sorba; Bassey Enodien; Stephan Vorburger
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 4.964

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.