Circadian components in energy and tension and their relation to physiological activation and performance.

The purpose of the study was to examine validity of R. Thayer's activation model regarding 24h variations of two subjective dimensions of activation (Energy and Tension), and their 24 h relations with indices of physiological activation and performance efficiency. The participants of the study (n = 28 females) spent 26 h under controlled laboratory conditions. Self-ratings of subjective activation and measurements of oral temperature, electrodermal activity, and performance on a visual vigilance task were done every 4 h. Twenty-four-hour variations were examined by means of repeated measures analyses of variance and by group mean cosinor analyses before and after controlling for the data trends. Self-ratings on both dimensions of subjective activation showed significant 24 h variation. Energy showed both nonrhythmic and endogenously determined circadian variation, while 24h variation of tension was dominantly nonrhythmic and most probably determined by exogenous factors. Significant 24 h covariation was found between energy and body temperature. A negative correlation between 24 h variation of energy and tension was also found. Considering low and intermediate levels of subjective activation established over the 24 h in this study, the association of the two dimensions of subjective activation did not prove to be consistent with the assumptions of Thayer's model.