Literature DB >> 15470959

Neuromuscular efficiency of the triceps surae in induced and voluntary contractions: morning and evening evaluations.

V Castaingts1, A Martin, J Van Hoecke, C Pérot.   

Abstract

Variations in force and electromyographic (EMG) activities of skeletal muscles with the time-of-day have been previously described, but not for a postural muscle, submitted to daily postural and locomotor tasks. In this article, mechanical performances, EMGs, and the ratio between these parameters, i.e., the neuromuscular efficiency (NME), were measured on the triceps surae (TS) of eight subjects, two times each day, at 6:00 and 18:00 h. NME was evaluated under different experimental conditions (electrically induced contractions, reflex contractions, maximal and submaximal voluntary isometric contractions, and during a natural movement, a drop jump) to determine whether mechanisms, peripheral or central in origin, were responsible for the eventual changes in NME with time-of-day. To calculate NME in induced conditions (NMEind), a supramaximal electrical stimulus was applied to the tibial nerve, and the maximal M wave of TS (TS Mmax) and the amplitude of the twitch tension (PtMmax) in response to this electrical stimulation were quantified. TS Mmax was significantly lower in the evening (mean gain value -10.7 +/- 5.5%, p < 0.05), whereas PtMmax was not significantly modified. NMEind (PtMmax/TS Mmax) was significantly higher in the evening (mean gain of 17.6 +/- 5.8%, p < 0.05), and this increase was necessarily peripheral in origin. Secondly, maximal tendon taps were applied to the Achilles tendon in order to quantify at the two times-of-day the reflexes in response to a mechanical stimulus. The maximal reflex, TS Tmax/Mmax (%), the peak amplitude of the twitch tension associated to this tendon jerk (PtTmax), and the corresponding NME (NMEreflex = PtTmax/TS Tmax/Mmax) were not affected by time-of-day, indicating that reflex excitability did not present daytime variations when tested under these conditions. Voluntary isometric contractions were required under maximal (MVC) and submaximal (25% MVC) conditions, and the corresponding torques and TS EMG were measured. MVC was higher in the evening (mean gain: 8.6 +/- 2.7%, p < 0.05) and TS EMGmax (normalized with regard to TS Mmax) also increased in the evening but not significantly; thus, NMEMvc was not modified. At 25% of MVC, TS EMG was significantly higher in the evening (mean gain of 23 +/- 13.9%, p <0.05) and a trend for a lower NME25%MVC in the evening was observed, a result probably representative of a higher muscle fatigue state in the evening. Finally, to test the muscle capacities during a natural task, a NME index was calculated during a drop jump (DJ). The NMEDJ was defined as the ratio between jump height and mean amplitude of TS EMG (% of TS Mmax) between the drop and the jump. Both jump height and NMEDJ were significantly higher in the evening (mean gains of 10.9 +/- 4.5% and 15.7 +/- 7.4%, respectively, p <0.05). In conclusion, daytime changes in the efficiency of postural muscles seem to depend on both peripheral and central mechanisms. According to the experimental conditions, NME of the postural muscle could increase, remain constant, or even decrease in the evening, and this result may reflect reverse effects of better contractile capacities and higher fatigue state.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15470959     DOI: 10.1081/cbi-120039207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chronobiol Int        ISSN: 0742-0528            Impact factor:   2.877


  11 in total

1.  Morning to evening changes in the electrical and mechanical properties of human soleus motor units activated by H reflex and M wave.

Authors:  Marie Guette; Julien Gondin; Alain Martin
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2005-10-27       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Changes in contractile and elastic properties of the triceps surae muscle induced by neuromuscular electrical stimulation training.

Authors:  Jean-Francois Grosset; Francis Canon; Chantal Pérot; Daniel Lambertz
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Establishing between-session reliability of TMS-conditioned soleus H-reflexes.

Authors:  W A Gray; M J Sabatier; T M Kesar; M R Borich
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 4.  Working around the clock: circadian rhythms and skeletal muscle.

Authors:  Xiping Zhang; Thomas J Dube; Karyn A Esser
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2009-08-20

5.  Time-of-Day Effects on EMG Parameters During the Wingate Test in Boys.

Authors:  Hichem Souissi; Hamdi Chtourou; Anis Chaouachi; Karim Chamari; Nizar Souissi; Mohamed Amri
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 2.988

6.  Characterizing the corticomotor connectivity of the bilateral ankle muscles during rest and isometric contraction in healthy adults.

Authors:  Charalambos C Charalambous; Jesse C Dean; DeAnna L Adkins; Colleen A Hanlon; Mark G Bowden
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 2.368

Review 7.  Morning and evening exercise.

Authors:  Dae Yun Seo; SungRyul Lee; Nari Kim; Kyung Soo Ko; Byoung Doo Rhee; Byung Joo Park; Jin Han
Journal:  Integr Med Res       Date:  2013-10-14

Review 8.  Time-of-Day Effects on Short-Duration Maximal Exercise Performance.

Authors:  Gerardo Gabriel Mirizio; Rodolfo Soares Mendes Nunes; Douglas Araujo Vargas; Carl Foster; Elaine Vieira
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Optimal Loading Height: A Practical Research of Drop Jump from Biomechanics.

Authors:  Zehao Tong; Wenjia Chen; Hang Xu; Feng Zhai
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 2.682

10.  Diurnal Variations in Physical Performance: Are there Morning-to-Evening Differences in Elite Male Handball Players?

Authors:  Ljubomir Pavlović; Nenad Stojiljković; Nikola Aksović; Emilija Stojanović; Zoran Valdevit; Aaron T Scanlan; Zoran Milanović
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 2.193

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.