Literature DB >> 15470677

Facts, fallacies, fears, and frustrations with human pheromones.

Charles J Wysocki1, George Preti.   

Abstract

Among primates in general, pheromones are of variable importance to social communication. Data on humans have generated the greatest controversy regarding the existence of pheromonal communication. In this review, the likelihood of pheromonal communication in humans is assessed with a discussion of chemical compounds produced by the axilla that may function as pheromones; the likelihood that the vomeronasal organ (VNO), a putative pheromone receptor organ in many other mammals, is functional in humans; and the possible ways pheromones operate in humans. In the human axilla, the interactions between the cutaneous microflora and axillary secretions render this region analogous to scent glands found in other primates. Both the chemistry of axillary secretions and their effects on conspecifics in humans appear to be analogous to other mammalian pheromone systems. Whichever chemical compounds serve a pheromonal function in humans, another unknown is the receptor. Although the VNO has been implicated in the reception of pheromones in many vertebrates, it is not the only pathway through which such information has access to the central nervous system; there is ample evidence to support the view that the olfactory epithelium can respond to pheromones. Furthermore, if a chemical activates receptors within the VNO, this does not necessarily mean that the compound is a pheromone. An important caveat for humans is that critical components typically found within the functioning VNO of other, nonprimate, mammals are lacking, suggesting that the human VNO does not function in the way that has been described for other mammals. In a broader perspective, pheromones can be classified as primers, signalers, modulators, and releasers. There is good evidence to support the presence of the former three in humans. Examples include affects on the menstrual cycle (primer effects); olfactory recognition of newborn by its mother (signaler); individuals may exude different odors based on mood (suggestive of modulator effects). However, there is no good evidence for releaser effects in adult humans. It is emphasized that no bioassay-guided study has led to the isolation of true human pheromones, a step that will elucidate specific functions to human chemical signals. (c) 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15470677     DOI: 10.1002/ar.a.20125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol        ISSN: 1552-4884


  43 in total

Review 1.  Use it or lose it: molecular evolution of sensory signaling in primates.

Authors:  Emily R Liman
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2006-08-03       Impact factor: 3.657

Review 2.  Sex and the nose: human pheromonal responses.

Authors:  Mahmood F Bhutta
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 3.  The combined role of the main olfactory and vomeronasal systems in social communication in mammals.

Authors:  Kevin R Kelliher
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2007-09-04       Impact factor: 3.587

Review 4.  Neural computations with mammalian infochemicals.

Authors:  A Gelperin
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2008-06-14       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 5.  Are mammal olfactory signals hiding right under our noses?

Authors:  Peter James Apps
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2013-05-15

Review 6.  The search for human pheromones: the lost decades and the necessity of returning to first principles.

Authors:  Tristram D Wyatt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 7.  Human olfaction: a constant state of change-blindness.

Authors:  Lee Sela; Noam Sobel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Transduction for pheromones in the main olfactory epithelium is mediated by the Ca2+ -activated channel TRPM5.

Authors:  Fabián López; Ricardo Delgado; Roberto López; Juan Bacigalupo; Diego Restrepo
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Chemosensory cues to conspecific emotional stress activate amygdala in humans.

Authors:  Lilianne R Mujica-Parodi; Helmut H Strey; Blaise Frederick; Robert Savoy; David Cox; Yevgeny Botanov; Denis Tolkunov; Denis Rubin; Jochen Weber
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The risk of extrapolation in neuroanatomy: the case of the Mammalian vomeronasal system.

Authors:  Ignacio Salazar; Pablo Sánchez Quinteiro
Journal:  Front Neuroanat       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 3.856

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.