Literature DB >> 15470349

Evaluation of dental arch width and form changes after orthodontic treatment and retention with a new computerized method.

Tülin Ugur Taner1, Semra Ciger, Hakan El, Derya Germeç, Alphan Es.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate longitudinal arch width and form changes and to define arch form types with a new computerized method. Maxillary and mandibular models of 21 Class II Division 1 patients were examined before treatment (T(0)), after treatment (T(1)), and an average of 3 years after retention (T(2)). Arch width measurements were made directly on scanned images of maxillary and mandibular models. Arch form changes at T(0)-T(1) and T(1)-T(2) were evaluated by superimposing the computer-generated Bezier arch curves with a computer program. Types of dental arch forms were defined by superimposing them with the pentamorphic arch system, which included 5 different types of arch forms: normal, ovoid, tapered, narrow ovoid, and narrow tapered. Maxillary arch widths were increased during orthodontic treatment. Mandibular posterior arch widths were also increased. The expansion of the mandibular arch forms was less than in the maxillary arch forms. Arch width changes were generally stable, except for reduction in maxillary and mandibular interlateral, inter-first premolar, and mandibular intercanine widths. Pretreatment maxillary arch forms were mostly tapered; mandibular arch forms were tapered and narrow tapered. In maxillary arch forms, 76% of the treatment changes were maintained. Mandibular arch form was maintained in 67% of the sample, both during treatment and after retention. In mandibular arches, 71% of orthodontically induced arch form changes were maintained.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15470349     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.08.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  6 in total

1.  Agreement of the clinician's choice of archwire selection on conventional and virtual models.

Authors:  Sahar Haddadpour; Saeed Reza Motamedian; Mohammad Behnaz; Sohrab Asefi; Alireza Akbarzadeh Bagheban; Amir Hossein Abdi; Mahtab Nouri
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Is arch form influenced by sagittal molar relationship or Bolton tooth-size discrepancy?

Authors:  Abdullah M Aldrees; Abdulmajeed M Al-Shujaa; Mohammad A Alqahtani; Ali S Aljhani
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 2.757

3.  Comparison of commercially available arch wires with normal dental arch in a group of Iranian population.

Authors:  Zohreh Hedayati; Farnaz Fakhri; Vahid Moshkel Gosha
Journal:  J Dent (Shiraz)       Date:  2015-06

4.  Determining shapes and dimensions of dental arches for the use of straight-wire arches in lingual technique.

Authors:  Silvana Allegrini Kairalla; Giuseppe Scuzzo; Tarcila Triviño; Leandro Velasco; Luca Lombardo; Luiz Renato Paranhos
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct

5.  Arch width changes in patients with Class II division 1 malocclusion treated with maxillary first premolar extraction and non-extraction method.

Authors:  Sajjad Shirazi; Mojgan Kachoei; Naiemeh Shahvaghar-Asl; Samaneh Shirazi; Reza Sharghi
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2016-10-01

6.  Dental Arch Dimensions in Saudi Adults.

Authors:  Omar Hamad Alkadhi; Sarah Fahad Almahfouz; Hana Abdulmajeed Tokhtah; Lamia Abdulaziz Binhuwaishel
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2018-02-15
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.