Literature DB >> 15470293

Update on the management of hypertension: recent clinical trials and the JNC 7.

Marvin Moser1.   

Abstract

The following issues are highlighted: Emphasis is placed on the importance of systolic blood pressure elevations in estimating risk and in determining prognosis. A review of placebo-controlled clinical trials indicates that cardiovascular events are statistically significantly reduced with diuretic- or b blocker-based treatment regimens. The question of whether blood pressure lowering alone or specific medications make the difference in outcome is discussed. Based on the results of numerous trials, it is apparent that blood pressure lowering itself is probably of greater importance in reducing cardiovascular events than the specific medication used. Meta-analyses suggest, however, that the use of an agent that blocks the renin-angiotensin aldosterone system is probably more effective in diabetics and in patients with nephropathy than a regimen based on calcium channel blocker therapy. The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT) reported no overall difference in coronary heart disease outcome among patients treated with a diuretic-based compared to a calcium channel blocker- or an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-based treatment program. However, patients in the diuretic group experienced fewer episodes of heart failure than in the calcium channel blocker group and fewer episodes of heart failure and strokes than those in the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor group. Results were similar in diabetics and nondiabetics. Possible reasons for this outcome are discussed. The Australian National Blood Pressure 2 study, which was unblinded, reported a marginally significantly better outcome only in male patients receiving an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-based regimen compared to those receiving a diuretic-based program. Finally, the Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC 7) is reviewed. Highlights of this report include the new designation of prehypertension, i.e., blood pressures of 120-139 mm Hg/80-89 mm Hg. The JNC 7 suggested that diuretics should be the first-step drug of choice in most patients, but listed numerous specific reasons why other agents should be used in special situations. The report stressed that the majority of patients will require two or more medications to achieve goal blood pressure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15470293      PMCID: PMC8109540          DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2004.03830.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)        ISSN: 1524-6175            Impact factor:   3.738


  34 in total

1.  Combination Drug Therapy in the Management of Hypertension: When, With What, and How?

Authors:  Marvin Moser; Thomas Pickering; James R. Sowers
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.738

2.  Renoprotective effect of the angiotensin-receptor antagonist irbesartan in patients with nephropathy due to type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  E J Lewis; L G Hunsicker; W R Clarke; T Berl; M A Pohl; J B Lewis; E Ritz; R C Atkins; R Rohde; I Raz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-09-20       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Suppositions and speculations--their possible effects on treatment decisions in the management of hypertension.

Authors:  M Moser
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 4.  Recent evidence on drug therapy of mild to moderate hypertension and decreased risk of coronary heart disease.

Authors:  P R Hebert; M Moser; J Mayer; R J Glynn; C H Hennekens
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1993-03-08

5.  Morbidity and mortality in patients randomised to double-blind treatment with a long-acting calcium-channel blocker or diuretic in the International Nifedipine GITS study: Intervention as a Goal in Hypertension Treatment (INSIGHT).

Authors:  M J Brown; C R Palmer; A Castaigne; P W de Leeuw; G Mancia; T Rosenthal; L M Ruilope
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-07-29       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  A comparison of outcomes with angiotensin-converting--enzyme inhibitors and diuretics for hypertension in the elderly.

Authors:  Lindon M H Wing; Christopher M Reid; Philip Ryan; Lawrence J Beilin; Mark A Brown; Garry L R Jennings; Colin I Johnston; John J McNeil; Graham J Macdonald; John E Marley; Trefor O Morgan; Malcolm J West
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-02-13       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  Relative efficacy of, and some adverse reactions to, different antihypertensive regimens.

Authors:  M Moser
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1989-01-17       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension study (LIFE): a randomised trial against atenolol.

Authors:  Björn Dahlöf; Richard B Devereux; Sverre E Kjeldsen; Stevo Julius; Gareth Beevers; Ulf de Faire; Frej Fyhrquist; Hans Ibsen; Krister Kristiansson; Ole Lederballe-Pedersen; Lars H Lindholm; Markku S Nieminen; Per Omvik; Suzanne Oparil; Hans Wedel
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-03-23       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  A calcium antagonist vs a non-calcium antagonist hypertension treatment strategy for patients with coronary artery disease. The International Verapamil-Trandolapril Study (INVEST): a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Carl J Pepine; Eileen M Handberg; Rhonda M Cooper-DeHoff; Ronald G Marks; Peter Kowey; Franz H Messerli; Giuseppe Mancia; José L Cangiano; David Garcia-Barreto; Matyas Keltai; Serap Erdine; Heather A Bristol; H Robert Kolb; George L Bakris; Jerome D Cohen; William W Parmley
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-12-03       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  More about prehypertension.

Authors:  Marvin Moser
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.738

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Can we justify goal blood pressure of <140/90 mm Hg in most hypertensives?

Authors:  Raymond R Townsend
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.369

2.  Effects of the angiotensin II receptor blockers telmisartan vs valsartan in combination with hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg once daily for the treatment of hypertension.

Authors:  William B White; Henry A Punzi; Debra Murwin; Stephen E Koval; Giora Davidai; Joel M Neutel
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.738

3.  Association between NPPA promoter methylation and hypertension: results from Gusu cohort and replication in an independent sample.

Authors:  Jing Li; Jinhua Zhu; Liyun Ren; Shengqi Ma; Bin Shen; Jia Yu; Rongyan Zhang; Mingzhi Zhang; Yan He; Hao Peng
Journal:  Clin Epigenetics       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 6.551

4.  Molecular mechanisms of experimental salt-sensitive hypertension.

Authors:  Bina Joe; Joseph I Shapiro
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 5.501

5.  Effects of Telmisartan with Hydrochlorothiazide versus Valsartan with Hydrochlorothiazide in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Hypertension.

Authors:  Ravi Marfatia; William B White; Helmut Schumacher
Journal:  Int J Hypertens       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 2.420

6.  Bevacizumab induced hypertension in gynecologic cancer: Does it resolve after completion of therapy?

Authors:  Bradley R Corr; Christopher Breed; Jeanelle Sheeder; Sarah Weisdack; Kian Behbakht
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Rep       Date:  2016-06-16

7.  Improving blood pressure control: increase the dose of diuretic or switch to a fixed-dose angiotensin receptor blocker/diuretic? the valsartan hydrochlorothiazide diuretic for initial control and titration to achieve optimal therapeutic effect (Val-DICTATE) trial.

Authors:  William B White; David A Calhoun; Rita Samuel; Addison A Taylor; Dion H Zappe; Das Purkayastha
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.738

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.