Literature DB >> 15469604

Complications of percutaneous dilating tracheostomy.

Dave A Dongelmans, Ary-Jan van der Lely, Robert Tepaske, Marcus J Schultz.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15469604      PMCID: PMC1065029          DOI: 10.1186/cc2941

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care        ISSN: 1364-8535            Impact factor:   9.097


× No keyword cloud information.

We read with interest the retrospective analysis of patients who underwent percutaneous tracheostomy by Fikkers and colleagues [1]. We were surprised by the high complication rates with both the guidewire dilating forceps (GWDF) technique and the Ciaglia Blue Rhino (CBR) technique in their series (25.1% and 41.5%, respectively). We prospectively collected data on perioperative complications of CBR from February 2000 to February 2003; in this period we performed 128 percutaneous dilating tracheostomies with the CBR technique. The complication rate was extremely low (Table 1). Although we must mention that we considered bleeding to have taken place only when blood loss was 'guesstimated' to be more than 20 ml, life-threatening blood loss or blood loss requiring surgical exploration was never encountered. Furthermore, we identified no complications related to needle insertion.
Table 1

Perioperative complications of Ciaglia Blue Rhino

Complicationn%
No complications12194.5
Minor complications
 Bleeding53.9
 Subcutaneous emphysema00
 Air leakage cuff00
 Puncture endotracheal tube00
 Puncture posterior tracheal wall00
 Accidental detubation00
 Hypotension10.8
Major complications
 Bleeding00
 Fausse route00
 Oesophageal perforation00
 Pneumothorax00
Conversion to surgical procedure110.8

1In one patient the percutaneous tracheostomy was converted into a surgical procedure, because of an overlying thyroid gland.

Our complication rate is in accordance with those found in other series [2,3].

Competing interests

None declared.

Authors' response

Bernard G Fikkers and Johannes G van der Hoeven We thank Dr Dongelmans and coworkers for their interest in our study. They state that they are surprised by our high complication rate and that their complication rate is in accordance with those found in other series, referring to just two studies. The first study, that by Polderman and coworkers [2], which employed the GWDF technique, found a major complication rate of 4.0%. The other study, that by Berrouschot and coworkers [3], in which the multiple dilator technique was employed, reported a 7.9% major perioperative complication rate, including one death (caused by tracheal laceration). Minor complications were not reported. It is difficult to believe that the patients in those two series suffered only from major complications and not any minor ones! We prospectively collected all our data and found major complication rates of 7.6% with GWDF and 5.3% with CBR. Because the difference between major and minor complications is important, we have decided for future research to categorize complications related to percutaneous tracheostomy as minor, intermediate and major (Fig. 1). Using these new definitions, the major complication rates in our series are 2.3% and 2.9%, respectively, because most major complications would be redefined as intermediate. Moreover, because we meticulously registered our perioperative complications, we are able to inform readers about all other complications they may encounter, although the majority is rarely clinically relevant.
Figure 1

Complications of percutaneous tracheostomy.

We congratulate our colleagues from Amsterdam for their excellent results. We analyzed the available literature published up until 2002 and found that major complications varied from 0% to 14% (average 3.0%) in 28 studies (4066 patients) that used the multiple dilator technique; from 0% to 4.9% (average 3.0%) in six studies (461 patients) that used the GWDF technique; and from 1.3% to 5.0% (average 2.8%) in three studies (286 patients) using the CBR technique. We therefore feel that our results are completely in accordance with the existing literature. (For full details of our analysis and reference details, see Additional file 1.) None declared.

Abbreviations

CBR = Ciaglia Blue Rhino; GWDF = guidewire dilating forceps.

Additional File 1

Three tables summarizing the complications of progressive dilational tracheostomy, guidewire dilating forceps technique and the peri-operative complications of the conic dilational technique in observational studies (with references). Click here for file
  3 in total

Review 1.  Perioperative complications of percutaneous dilational tracheostomy.

Authors:  J Berrouschot; J Oeken; L Steiniger; D Schneider
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy in the ICU: optimal organization, low complication rates, and description of a new complication.

Authors:  Kees H Polderman; Jan Jaap Spijkstra; Remco de Bree; Herman M T Christiaans; Harry P M M Gelissen; Jos P J Wester; Armand R J Girbes
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 9.410

3.  Comparison of two percutaneous tracheostomy techniques, guide wire dilating forceps and Ciaglia Blue Rhino: a sequential cohort study.

Authors:  Bernard G Fikkers; Marieke Staatsen; Sabine G G F Lardenoije; Frank J A van den Hoogen; Johannes G van der Hoeven
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2004-07-05       Impact factor: 9.097

  3 in total
  6 in total

1.  [Dilatation tracheotomy update : indications, limitations and management of complications].

Authors:  S Koscielny; O Guntinas-Lichius
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  [Hemorrhage of the innominate artery during percutaneous dilatation tracheotomy].

Authors:  N Hulde; M Köppen; M Gratzke; H Kisch-Wedel; P Brenner; V Huge
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  Early and late outcome after single step dilatational tracheostomy versus the guide wire dilating forceps technique: a prospective randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Bernard G Fikkers; Marieke Staatsen; Frank J A van den Hoogen; Johannes G van der Hoeven
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 4.  Utility of Tracheostomy in Patients With COVID-19 and Other Special Considerations.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Mecham; Olivia J Thomas; Phillip Pirgousis; Jeffrey R Janus
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Comparison of complications in percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy versus surgical tracheostomy.

Authors:  Siamak Yaghoobi; Hamid Kayalha; Raziyeh Ghafouri; Zohreh Yazdi; Marzieh Beigom Khezri
Journal:  Glob J Health Sci       Date:  2014-04-20

6.  Percutaneous Tracheostomy under Real-time Ultrasound Guidance in Coagulopathic Patients: A Single-center Experience.

Authors:  Praveen Kumar; Deepak Govil; Sweta J Patel; K N Jagadeesh; Sachin Gupta; Shrikanth Srinivasan; Mozammil Shafi; Rahul Harne; Divya Pal; Srinivas Monanga; Vipal Chawla; Deeksha S Tomar
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2020-02
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.