Literature DB >> 15469295

Leaving group effects in gas-phase substitutions and eliminations.

Scott Gronert1, Adelaide E Fagin, Keiko Okamoto, Sudha Mogali, Lawrence M Pratt.   

Abstract

Using a methodology recently developed for studying the product distributions of gas-phase S(N)2 and E2 reactions, the effect of the leaving group on the reaction rate and branching ratio was investigated. Using a dianion as the nucleophile, reactions with a series of alkyl bromides, iodides, and trifluoroacetates were examined. The alkyl groups in the study are ethyl, n-propyl, n-butyl, isobutyl, isopropyl, sec-butyl, and tert-butyl. The data indicate that leaving group abilities are directly related to the exothermicities of the reaction processes in both the gas phase and the condensed phase. Gas-phase data give a reactivity order of iodide > trifluoroacetate > bromide for S(N)2 and E2 reactions. Previous condensed phase data indicate a reactivity order of iodide > bromide > trifluoroacetate for substitution reactions; however, the basicities of bromide and trifluoroacetate are reversed in the condensed phase so this reactivity pattern does reflect the relative reaction exothermicities. Aside from this variation, the gas-phase data parallel condensed phase data indicating that the substituent effects are rooted in the nature of the alkyl substrate rather than in differences in solvation. The experimental data are supported by calculations at the MP2/6-311+G(d,p)//MP2/6-31+(d) level.

Entities:  

Year:  2004        PMID: 15469295     DOI: 10.1021/ja047002u

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Chem Soc        ISSN: 0002-7863            Impact factor:   15.419


  6 in total

1.  DFT study on the reactions of ClO⁻/BrO⁻ with RCl (R = CH₃, C₂H₅, and C₃H₇) in gas phase.

Authors:  Liang Junxi; Wang Yanbin; Zhang Qiang; Li Yu; Geng Zhiyuan; Wang Xiuhong
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 1.810

2.  Nucleophilic aromatic substitution with dianions: reactions driven by the release of Coulomb repulsion.

Authors:  Allison D Eanes; Diogo O Noin; Maheteme K Kebede; Scott Gronert
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 3.109

3.  Understanding E2 versus SN2 Competition under Acidic and Basic Conditions.

Authors:  Lando P Wolters; Yi Ren; F Matthias Bickelhaupt
Journal:  ChemistryOpen       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 2.911

4.  Imaging dynamic fingerprints of competing E2 and SN2 reactions.

Authors:  Eduardo Carrascosa; Jennifer Meyer; Jiaxu Zhang; Martin Stei; Tim Michaelsen; William L Hase; Li Yang; Roland Wester
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  SN2 versus E2 Competition of F- and PH2- Revisited.

Authors:  Pascal Vermeeren; Thomas Hansen; Maxime Grasser; Daniela Rodrigues Silva; Trevor A Hamlin; F Matthias Bickelhaupt
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 4.354

6.  A Unified Framework for Understanding Nucleophilicity and Protophilicity in the SN 2/E2 Competition.

Authors:  Pascal Vermeeren; Thomas Hansen; Paul Jansen; Marcel Swart; Trevor A Hamlin; F Matthias Bickelhaupt
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 5.236

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.