Literature DB >> 15468542

Are there acceptable alternatives to amalgam?

J Rodway Mackert1, Michael J Wahl.   

Abstract

Amalgam has been the material of choice for restoring posterior teeth for more than 100 years. The past 25 years have witnessed significant advances in restorative materials themselves and in the bonding systems for retaining a restoration in the prepared tooth. As a result, there has been a shift toward resin composite materials during this same period because of concerns about the esthetics and biocompatibility of dental amalgam. In addition, other materials such as glass ionomer cements, ceramic inlays and onlays, and gold alloys have been used as alternatives to amalgam. This article will review recent studies on the longevity and biocompatibility of these alternatives to dental amalgam.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15468542

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Calif Dent Assoc        ISSN: 1043-2256


  4 in total

Review 1.  Atraumatic restorative treatment versus amalgam restoration longevity: a systematic review.

Authors:  Steffen Mickenautsch; Veerasamy Yengopal; Avijit Banerjee
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 2.  Resin-based composite materials: elution and pollution.

Authors:  Steven Mulligan; Paul V Hatton; Nicolas Martin
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 2.727

Review 3.  Adhesively bonded versus non-bonded amalgam restorations for dental caries.

Authors:  Anirudha Agnihotry; Zbys Fedorowicz; Mona Nasser
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-03-08

4.  Biocompatibility of dental amalgams.

Authors:  Yurdanur Uçar; William A Brantley
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2011-11-23
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.