Literature DB >> 15468399

A prospective, blinded, randomized, controlled clinical trial of topical negative pressure use in skin grafting.

Elias Moisidis1, Tim Heath, Catherine Boorer, Kevin Ho, Anand K Deva.   

Abstract

Topical negative pressure has been demonstrated to improve graft take in a number of noncomparative studies. This study aimed to assess whether split-thickness skin graft take is improved qualitatively or quantitatively with topical negative pressure therapy compared with standard bolster dressings. A blinded, prospective, randomized trial was conducted of 22 adult inpatients of Liverpool Hospital between July of 2001 and July of 2002 who had wounds requiring skin grafting. After grafting, each wound half was randomized to receive either a standard bolster dressing or a topical negative pressure dressing. Skin graft assessment was performed at 2 weeks by a single observer blinded to the randomization. Two patients were lost to follow-up and were excluded from the study. There were 20 patients (12 men and eightwomen) in the study group. The median patient age was 64 years (range, 27 to 88 years), and the mean wound size was 128 cm2 (range, 35 to 450 cm2). The wound exposed subcutaneous fat in eight patients, muscle in six patients, paratenon in four patients, and deep fascia in two patients. At 2 weeks, wounds that received a topical negative pressure dressing had a greater degree of epithelialization in six cases (30 percent), the same degree of epithelialization in nine cases (45 percent), and less epithelialization in five cases (25 percent) compared with their respective control wounds. Graft quality following topical negative pressure therapy was subjectively determined to be better in 10 cases (50 percent), equivalent in seven cases (35 percent), and worse in three cases (15 percent). Although the quantitative graft take was not significant, the qualitative graft take was found to be significantly better with the use of topical negative pressure therapy (p < 0.05). Topical negative pressure significantly improved the qualitative appearance of split-thickness skin grafts as compared with standard bolster dressings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15468399     DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000133168.57199.e1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  72 in total

Review 1.  Optimal use of negative pressure wound therapy for skin grafts.

Authors:  Subhas Gupta
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 2.  The micrograft concept for wound healing: strategies and applications.

Authors:  Atanu Biswas; Manish Bharara; Craig Hurst; David G Armstrong; Horacio Rilo
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-07-01

Review 3.  Negative pressure wound therapy: evidence-based treatment for complex diabetic foot wounds.

Authors:  Jennifer J Suess; Paul J Kim; John S Steinberg
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 4.  [Vacuum-assisted closure therapy and wound coverage in soft tissue injury. Clinical use].

Authors:  G Holle; G Germann; M Sauerbier; K Riedel; H von Gregory; M Pelzer
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 5.  Topical negative pressure wound therapy: a review of its role and guidelines for its use in the management of acute wounds.

Authors:  Estas Bovill; Paul E Banwell; Luc Teot; Elof Eriksson; Colin Song; Jim Mahoney; Ronny Gustafsson; Raymund Horch; Anand Deva; Ian Whitworth
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 6.  Evidence-based medicine: vacuum-assisted closure in wound care management.

Authors:  Judith E Hunter; Luc Teot; Raymond Horch; Paul E Banwell
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.315

7.  Skin graft fixation in severe burns: use of topical negative pressure.

Authors:  L P Kamolz; D B Lumenta; D Parvizi; M Wiedner; I Justich; M Keck; K Pfurtscheller; M Schintler
Journal:  Ann Burns Fire Disasters       Date:  2014-09-30

Review 8.  Negative-pressure wound therapy: systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Frank Peinemann; Stefan Sauerland
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 5.594

9.  Using negative pressure therapy for improving skin graft taking on genital area defects following Fournier gangrene.

Authors:  Erkan Orhan; Dilek Şenen
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2017-08-01

10.  Does treatment of split-thickness skin grafts with negative-pressure wound therapy improve tissue markers of wound healing in a porcine experimental model?

Authors:  Christopher Ward; David Ciraulo; Michael Coulter; Steven Desjardins; Lucy Liaw; Sarah Peterson
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.313

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.