BACKGROUND: HLA class I peptide tetramers represent powerful diagnostic tools for detection and monitoring of antigen-specific CD8(+) T cells. The impetus for the current multicenter study is the critical need to standardize tetramer flow cytometry if it is to be implemented as a routine diagnostic assay. Hence, the European Working Group on Clinical Cell Analysis set out to develop and evaluate a single-platform tetramer-based method that used cytomegalovirus (CMV) as the antigenic model. METHODS: Absolute numbers of CMV-specific CD8(+) T cells were obtained by combining the percentage of tetramer-binding cells with the absolute CD8(+) T-cell count. Six send-outs of stabilized blood from healthy individuals or CMV-carrying donors with CMV-specific CD8(+) T-cell counts of 3 to 10 cells/microl were distributed to 7 to 16 clinical sites. These sites were requested to enumerate CD8(+) T cells and, in the case of CMV-positive donors, CMV-specific subsets on three separate occasions using the standard method. RESULTS: Between-site coefficients of variation of less than 10% (absolute CD8(+) T-cell counts) and approximately 30% (percentage and absolute numbers of CMV-specific CD8(+) T cells) were achieved. Within-site coefficients of variation were approximately 5% (absolute CD8(+) T-cell counts), approximately 9% (percentage CMV-specific CD8(+) T cells), and approximately 17% (absolute CMV-specific CD8(+) T-cell counts). The degree of variation tended to correlate inversely with the proportion of CMV-specific CD8(+) T-cell subsets. CONCLUSIONS: The single-platform MHC tetramer-based method for antigen-specific CD8(+) T-cell counting has been evaluated by a European group of laboratories and can be considered a reproducible assay for routine enumeration of antigen-specific CD8(+) T cells. (c) 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
BACKGROUND: HLA class I peptide tetramers represent powerful diagnostic tools for detection and monitoring of antigen-specific CD8(+) T cells. The impetus for the current multicenter study is the critical need to standardize tetramer flow cytometry if it is to be implemented as a routine diagnostic assay. Hence, the European Working Group on Clinical Cell Analysis set out to develop and evaluate a single-platform tetramer-based method that used cytomegalovirus (CMV) as the antigenic model. METHODS: Absolute numbers of CMV-specific CD8(+) T cells were obtained by combining the percentage of tetramer-binding cells with the absolute CD8(+) T-cell count. Six send-outs of stabilized blood from healthy individuals or CMV-carrying donors with CMV-specific CD8(+) T-cell counts of 3 to 10 cells/microl were distributed to 7 to 16 clinical sites. These sites were requested to enumerate CD8(+) T cells and, in the case of CMV-positive donors, CMV-specific subsets on three separate occasions using the standard method. RESULTS: Between-site coefficients of variation of less than 10% (absolute CD8(+) T-cell counts) and approximately 30% (percentage and absolute numbers of CMV-specific CD8(+) T cells) were achieved. Within-site coefficients of variation were approximately 5% (absolute CD8(+) T-cell counts), approximately 9% (percentage CMV-specific CD8(+) T cells), and approximately 17% (absolute CMV-specific CD8(+) T-cell counts). The degree of variation tended to correlate inversely with the proportion of CMV-specific CD8(+) T-cell subsets. CONCLUSIONS: The single-platform MHC tetramer-based method for antigen-specific CD8(+) T-cell counting has been evaluated by a European group of laboratories and can be considered a reproducible assay for routine enumeration of antigen-specific CD8(+) T cells. (c) 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: Sean X Leng; Tao Qu; Richard D Semba; Huifen Li; Xu Yao; Tricia Nilles; Xi Yang; Bhavish Manwani; Jeremy D Walston; Luigi Ferrucci; Linda P Fried; Joseph B Margolick; Jay H Bream Journal: Age (Dordr) Date: 2011-01-28
Authors: Cécile Gouttefangeas; Cliburn Chan; Sebastian Attig; Tania T Køllgaard; Hans-Georg Rammensee; Stefan Stevanović; Dorothee Wernet; Per thor Straten; Marij J P Welters; Christian Ottensmeier; Sjoerd H van der Burg; Cedrik M Britten Journal: Cancer Immunol Immunother Date: 2015-02-18 Impact factor: 6.968
Authors: Sylvia Borchers; Melanie Bremm; Thomas Lehrnbecher; Elke Dammann; Brigitte Pabst; Benno Wölk; Ruth Esser; Meral Yildiz; Matthias Eder; Michael Stadler; Peter Bader; Hans Martin; Andrea Jarisch; Gisbert Schneider; Thomas Klingebiel; Arnold Ganser; Eva M Weissinger; Ulrike Koehl Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-12-13 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Cedrik Michael Britten; Sylvia Janetzki; Leah Ben-Porat; Timothy M Clay; Michael Kalos; Holden Maecker; Kunle Odunsi; Michael Pride; Lloyd Old; Axel Hoos; Pedro Romero Journal: Cancer Immunol Immunother Date: 2009-03-04 Impact factor: 6.968
Authors: C M Britten; C Gouttefangeas; M J P Welters; G Pawelec; S Koch; C Ottensmeier; A Mander; S Walter; A Paschen; J Müller-Berghaus; I Haas; A Mackensen; T Køllgaard; P thor Straten; M Schmitt; K Giannopoulos; R Maier; H Veelken; C Bertinetti; A Konur; C Huber; S Stevanović; T Wölfel; S H van der Burg Journal: Cancer Immunol Immunother Date: 2007-08-25 Impact factor: 6.968