Literature DB >> 15468133

A simple method to determine the need for glacial acetic acid treatment of bloody ThinPrep Pap tests before slide processing.

Leslie R Rowe1, Joel S Bentz.   

Abstract

ThinPrep (TP) Papanicolaou (Pap) samples containing excessive blood often result in unsatisfactory preparations, possibly leading to undetected gynecologic disease, and added inconvenience to patients and clinicians. Reprocessing of these samples with a glacial acetic acid wash is effective at eliminating blood, providing satisfactory preparation and detection of lesions. However, it increases laboratory costs and decreases work flow efficiency. We report the use of a color standard for gauging the necessity of performing a glacial acetic acid wash before TP processing. This "preprocessing" was found to reduce the costs associated with reprocessing by 48%, while maintaining high preparation quality by improved sample adequacy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15468133     DOI: 10.1002/dc.20152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Cytopathol        ISSN: 1097-0339            Impact factor:   1.582


  3 in total

1.  Precancerous cervical lesions and HPV genotypes identified in previously unsatisfactory cervical smear tests after inexpensive glacial acetic acid processing.

Authors:  Carolann Risley; Kim R Geisinger; Jennifer C Robinson; Mary W Stewart; Lei Zhang; Rhonda Alexander; Stephen S Raab
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 3.561

2.  Unsatisfactory rates vary between cervical cytology samples prepared using ThinPrep and SurePath platforms: a review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Daniel Fontaine; Nadira Narine; Christopher Naugler
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  The effectiveness of acetic acid wash protocol and the interpretation patterns of blood contaminated cervical cytology ThinPrep(®) specimens.

Authors:  Nora K Frisch; Yasin Ahmed; Seema Sethi; Daniel Neill; Tatyana Kalinicheva; Vinod Shidham
Journal:  Cytojournal       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 2.091

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.