Literature DB >> 15467927

[Results of wavefront-guided LASIK].

T Hammer1, G I W Duncker, S Giessler.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Wavefront-guided LASIK procedures provide patients with customized corneal treatments. The computer ablation profiles correct both spherical and/or cylindrical errors of refraction and aberrations up to the fifth order.
METHODS: We performed wavefront-guided LASIK treatments on 62 patients using the Keracor 217 Z. The spherical equivalent was -6.11 +/-2.29 D on the average. Data collected for 3 months were evaluated to determine the predictability, efficacy, stability, and safety of the refractive procedure.
RESULTS: We found good predictability of the refractive result after correcting -1 to -6 D of myopia. Beyond -7 D there were over- and undercorrections of +/-2 D in 10% of the procedures. A UCVA of 0.8 or better was observed in 53% of the patients 3 months postoperatively, and 75% of the patients reached a BCVA of 0.8 or better. After 3 months 6% lost 2 lines, 22% lost 1 line, 22% of the patients gained 1-2 lines, and BCVA remained unchanged in 55%. The fluctuation of the refraction was about -0.23 D during the first 3 postoperative months.
CONCLUSIONS: The low and middle range of myopia can be corrected very accurately using the wavefront technology. Higher degrees of myopia face both under- and overcorrections. Postoperative refractions become stable very quickly. However, the visual acuity changes even 6 months postoperatively. From our point of view, wavefront correction by LASIK should be more reliable in terms of centration, accuracy, and standardization to get better results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15467927     DOI: 10.1007/s00347-004-0991-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmologe        ISSN: 0941-293X            Impact factor:   1.059


  10 in total

1.  Ocular aberrations before and after myopic corneal refractive surgery: LASIK-induced changes measured with laser ray tracing.

Authors:  E Moreno-Barriuso; J M Lloves; S Marcos; R Navarro; L Llorente; S Barbero
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  [Fundamentals of wavefront-guided refractive corneal surgery].

Authors:  M Mrochen; T Seiler
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  Maximum permissible lateral decentration in aberration-sensing and wavefront-guided corneal ablation.

Authors:  Michael Bueeler; Michael Mrochen; Theo Seiler
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.351

4.  [Aberrometry due dilated pupils--Which mydriatic should be used?].

Authors:  Susan Giessler; Thomas Hammer; Gernot I W Duncker
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 0.700

5.  Optical response to LASIK surgery for myopia from total and corneal aberration measurements.

Authors:  S Marcos; S Barbero; L Llorente; J Merayo-Lloves
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Clinical results of wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis 3 months after surgery.

Authors:  M Mrochen; M Kaemmerer; T Seiler
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.351

7.  Wavefront-guided versus standard laser in situ keratomileusis to correct low to moderate myopia.

Authors:  Rudy M M A Nuijts; Vaishaly A Nabar; Willem J Hament; Fred A G J Eggink
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.351

8.  Effect of pupillary dilation on corneal optical aberrations after photorefractive keratectomy.

Authors:  C E Martínez; R A Applegate; S D Klyce; M B McDonald; J P Medina; H C Howland
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-08

9.  Operative correction of ocular aberrations to improve visual acuity.

Authors:  T Seiler; M Mrochen; M Kaemmerer
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 10.  Limits to vision: can we do better than nature?

Authors:  R A Applegate
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.573

  10 in total
  4 in total

1.  [Classification of biomedical research reports as a reference for evidence-based medicine in ophthalmology. A survey considering as example the journal Der Ophthalmologe].

Authors:  H P N Scholl; M Fleckenstein; T U Krohne; F G Holz
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  The future role of wavefront-guided excimer ablation.

Authors:  Thomas Kohnen; Christoph Kühne; Jens Bühren
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  [Cyclorotation of the eye in wavefront-guided LASIK using a static eyetracker with iris recognition].

Authors:  T Kohnen; C Kühne; M Cichocki; A Strenger
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  Comparison of higher-order aberrations between eyes with natural supervision and highly myopic eyes in Koreans.

Authors:  Min Kim; Young Gi Lee; Kyung Ryul Seo; Eung Kweon Kim; Hyung Keun Lee
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.