Literature DB >> 15467676

Blunt splenic injury: operation versus angiographic embolization.

Wendy L Wahl1, Karla S Ahrns, Steven Chen, Mark R Hemmila, Stephen A Rowe, Saman Arbabi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Splenic injuries, like other blunt traumatic injuries, are increasingly treated with non-operative management. Angiographic embolization (AE) has emerged as an alternative modality for treatment of splenic injuries. We hypothesized that splenic embolization would lead to equivalent, if not improved, outcomes in terms of mortality, total costs, complications, and duration of stay.
METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospective data set was performed for all adult splenic injuries admitted to our level I trauma center from 2000 through 2003. Demographics, number of red cell units, emergency department hemodynamics, costs, and outcomes were examined. The operative group included those who underwent computed tomography (CT) first then went to the operating room (OR) (CT+OR) or those who went directly to the OR.
RESULTS: There were 25 CT+OR and 24 AE patients of 164 blunt splenic injuries. After univariate analysis, higher injury severity score (ISS), lower systolic blood pressure, lower pH, and higher packed red blood cell transfusions were associated with increased mortality and duration of stay. The splenic Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS; mean +/- SD) was the same for AE compared to CT+OR patients (3.8 +/- 0.4 vs 3.5 +/- 0.9). Although the AE group was older (50 +/- 20 vs 36 +/- 13 years, P < .01), Glasgow Comma Score (13 +/- 4 vs 11 +/- 5), age, highest heart rate (109 +/- 24 vs 120 +/- 43), and splenic AIS were not predictive of the need for an operation. Abdominal complications were lower in the AE group compared to the CT+OR (13% vs 29%), but mortality was not different (8% vs 4%). Total costs were similar for both groups after adjustment for ISS, GCS, pH, pretreatment transfusions, and spleen AIS (AE, $49,300 +/- $40,460 vs CT+OR, $54,590 +/- $34,760). The non-operative failure rate in this study was 2%.
CONCLUSIONS: AE of splenic injuries is safe and associated with fewer complications. The spleen AIS, heart rate, age, and GCS did not correlate with the need for an operation. Higher ISS, lower blood pressure, lower pH, and increased number of packed red blood cell transfusions were better indicators of the need for an operation versus embolization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15467676     DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2004.06.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  13 in total

1.  Intraparenchymal Doppler ultrasound after proximal embolization of the splenic artery in trauma patients.

Authors:  Johann B Dormagen; Christine Gaarder; Leiv Sandvik; Pål A Naess; Nils E Kløw
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  The role of interventional radiology in trauma.

Authors:  Jennifer E Gould; Suresh Vedantham
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.513

3.  Three cases of spontaneous splenic rupture in malignant lymphoma.

Authors:  Jun Amaki; Tatsuya Sekiguchi; Shinichiro Hiraiwa; Hiroshi Kajiwara; Hidetsugu Kawai; Akifumi Ichiki; Naoya Nakamura; Kiyoshi Ando
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 2.490

Review 4.  Is non-operative management safe and effective for all splenic blunt trauma? A systematic review.

Authors:  Roberto Cirocchi; Carlo Boselli; Alessia Corsi; Eriberto Farinella; Chiara Listorti; Stefano Trastulli; Claudio Renzi; Jacopo Desiderio; Alberto Santoro; Lucio Cagini; Amilcare Parisi; Adriano Redler; Giuseppe Noya; Abe Fingerhut
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 5.  Post-traumatic Splenic Injury Outcomes for Nonoperative and Operative Management: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Sabrina Gill; John Hoff; Ashley Mila; Carol Sanchez; Mark McKenney; Adel Elkbuli
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Timeliness in obtaining emergent percutaneous procedures in severely injured patients: how long is too long and should we create quality assurance guidelines?

Authors:  Andrew Smith; Jean-Francois Ouellet; Daniel Niven; Andrew W Kirkpatrick; Elijah Dixon; Scott D'Amours; Chad G Ball
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 7.  The role of interventional radiology in abdominopelvic trauma.

Authors:  Anna Maria Ierardi; Ejona Duka; Natalie Lucchina; Chiara Floridi; Alessandro De Martino; Daniela Donat; Federico Fontana; Gianpaolo Carrafiello
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Transarterial embolization with n-butyl cyanoacrylate for the treatment of active abdominopelvic bleeding in the polytraumatized patient.

Authors:  Rafael Kiyuze de Freitas; Lucas Moretti Monsignore; Luis Henrique de Castro-Afonso; Guilherme Seizem Nakiri; Jorge Elias-Junior; Valdair Francisco Muglia; Sandro Scarpelini; Daniel Giansante Abud
Journal:  CVIR Endovasc       Date:  2021-05-06

9.  Percutaneous transcatheter arterial embolization in haemodynamically stable patients with blunt splenic injury.

Authors:  Peter Popovic; Dragoje Stanisavljevic; Miran Jeromel
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 2.991

10.  Angiography and embolisation for solid abdominal organ injury in adults - a current perspective.

Authors:  Adam Wallis; Michael D Kelly; Lyn Jones
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2010-06-28       Impact factor: 5.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.