Literature DB >> 15467534

Are racial differences in vaginal pH explained by vaginal flora?

Kevin Fiscella1, Mark A Klebanoff.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The study assessed racial differences in vaginal pH among women without bacterial vaginosis. STUDY
DESIGN: Data from the Vaginal Infections and Prematurity (VIP) Study were analyzed. From 1984 to 1989, 13,917 largely low-income women were enrolled during routine prenatal visits from 23 to 26 weeks' gestation. Vaginal cultures, Gram stains, and pH levels were collected. Comparisons of pH by race were made among women with Gram stain scores <7 and without trichomoniasis before and after adjustment for actual Gram stain score.
RESULTS: Among women with Gram stain scores <7, there was a modest but statistically significant racial difference in vaginal pH level. However, after controlling for difference in Gram stain score, age, and study site, there was no longer a significant difference in vaginal pH.
CONCLUSION: There is no significant difference in vaginal pH level between black and white women after controlling for differences in confounding factors, particularly vaginal flora.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15467534     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.03.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  9 in total

Review 1.  Exploring a road map to counter misconceptions about the cervicovaginal microbiome and disease.

Authors:  Jean M Macklaim; Craig R Cohen; Gilbert Donders; Gregory B Gloor; Janet E Hill; Groesbeck P Parham; Jacques Ravel; Gregory Spear; Janneke van de Wijgert; Gregor Reid
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 3.060

2.  Incidence and epidemiology of Streptococcus pseudoporcinus in the genital tract.

Authors:  Kevin A Stoner; Lorna K Rabe; Michele N Austin; Leslie A Meyn; Sharon L Hillier
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-12-29       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  Pathogenesis of Bacterial Vaginosis: Discussion of Current Hypotheses.

Authors:  Christina A Muzny; Jane R Schwebke
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 5.226

Review 4.  The role of metagenomics in understanding the human microbiome in health and disease.

Authors:  Rebeca Martín; Sylvie Miquel; Philippe Langella; Luis G Bermúdez-Humarán
Journal:  Virulence       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 5.882

5.  Dietary intake of selected nutrients affects bacterial vaginosis in women.

Authors:  Yasmin H Neggers; Tonja R Nansel; William W Andrews; Jane R Schwebke; Kai-fun Yu; Robert L Goldenberg; Mark A Klebanoff
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.798

Review 6.  A new era of the vaginal microbiome: advances using next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  Jennifer M Fettweis; Myrna G Serrano; Philippe H Girerd; Kimberly K Jefferson; Gregory A Buck
Journal:  Chem Biodivers       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.408

7.  Differences in vaginal microbiome in African American women versus women of European ancestry.

Authors:  Jennifer M Fettweis; J Paul Brooks; Myrna G Serrano; Nihar U Sheth; Philippe H Girerd; David J Edwards; Jerome F Strauss; Kimberly K Jefferson; Gregory A Buck
Journal:  Microbiology (Reading)       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 2.777

8.  Correlates of the molecular vaginal microbiota composition of African women.

Authors:  Raju Gautam; Hanneke Borgdorff; Vicky Jespers; Suzanna C Francis; Rita Verhelst; Mary Mwaura; Sinead Delany-Moretlwe; Gilles Ndayisaba; Jordan K Kyongo; Liselotte Hardy; Joris Menten; Tania Crucitti; Evgeni Tsivtsivadze; Frank Schuren; Janneke H H M van de Wijgert
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2015-02-21       Impact factor: 3.090

Review 9.  Evaluation of Health Disparity in Bacterial Vaginosis and the Implications for HIV-1 Acquisition in African American Women.

Authors:  Donald J Alcendor
Journal:  Am J Reprod Immunol       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 3.886

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.