Literature DB >> 1546724

Multi-state investigation of the actual disinfection/sterilization of endoscopes in health care facilities.

R G Kaczmarek1, R M Moore, J McCrohan, D A Goldmann, C Reynolds, C Caquelin, E Israel.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this investigation was to observe and assess the actual disinfection or sterilization of endoscopes in health care facilities.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 22 hospitals and four ambulatory care centers in three states were studied. Facility protocols were reviewed, interviews conducted with relevant personnel, actual disinfection or sterilization procedures observed, and biologic tests performed to determine and assess disinfection/sterilization procedures.
RESULTS: Fundamental errors observed during the course of the investigation included respective failures to time the period of disinfection, to clean all channels, to flush all channels with disinfectant, to fully immerse the endoscope in the disinfectant solution, and to use a disinfectant. At 78% of the facilities, failure to sterilize all biopsy forceps was observed. A total of 23.9% of the bacterial cultures from the internal channels of 71 gastrointestinal endoscopes grew 100,000 colonies or more of bacteria. These cultures were obtained after the completion of all disinfection/sterilization procedures and the device was deemed ready for use in the next patient.
CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that actual disinfection/sterilization procedures for endoscopes are not always optimal, and high-level disinfection of gastrointestinal endoscopes is not always achieved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1546724     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9343(92)90074-l

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  9 in total

1.  Population-based fecal occult blood screening for colon cancer: will the benefits outweigh the harm?

Authors:  K G Marshall
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-09-05       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Epidemiology and Prevention of Infections Related to Endoscopy.

Authors:  Arjun Srinivasan
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.725

3.  Current GI endoscope disinfection and QA practices.

Authors:  Frank M Moses; Jennifer S Lee
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Glutaraldehyde proctitis.

Authors:  R R Babb; B T Paaso
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1995-11

5.  Synergistic effect of imp/ostA and msbA in hydrophobic drug resistance of Helicobacter pylori.

Authors:  Hung-Chuan Chiu; Tzu-Lung Lin; Jyh-Chin Yang; Jin-Town Wang
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2009-07-13       Impact factor: 3.605

6.  Bactericidal, virucidal, and mycobactericidal activities of reused alkaline glutaraldehyde in an endoscopy unit.

Authors:  J N Mbithi; V S Springthorpe; S A Sattar; M Pacquette
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 7.  American College of Chest Physicians and American Association for Bronchology [corrected] consensus statement: prevention of flexible bronchoscopy-associated infection.

Authors:  Atul C Mehta; Udaya B S Prakash; Robert Garland; Edward Haponik; Leonard Moses; William Schaffner; Gerard Silvestri
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 9.410

8.  Recent update of gastrointestinal endoscope reprocessing.

Authors:  Kyong Hee Hong; Yun Jeong Lim
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2013-05-31

9.  The Occurrence and Prevention of Infections Associated with Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.

Authors:  Michelle V. Lisgaris
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.663

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.