Literature DB >> 15467058

Racial and ethnic differences in time to acute reperfusion therapy for patients hospitalized with myocardial infarction.

Elizabeth H Bradley1, Jeph Herrin, Yongfei Wang, Robert L McNamara, Tashonna R Webster, David J Magid, Martha Blaney, Eric D Peterson, John G Canto, Charles V Pollack, Harlan M Krumholz.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Nonwhite patients experience significantly longer times to fibrinolytic therapy (door-to-drug times) and percutaneous coronary intervention (door-to-balloon times) than white patients, raising concerns of health care disparities, but the reasons for these patterns are poorly understood.
OBJECTIVES: To estimate race/ethnicity differences in door-to-drug and door-to-balloon times for patients receiving primary reperfusion for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; to examine how sociodemographic factors, insurance status, clinical characteristics, and hospital features mediate racial/ethnic differences. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Retrospective, observational study using admission and treatment data from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction (NRMI) for a US cohort of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction or left bundle-branch block and receiving reperfusion therapy. Patients (73,032 receiving fibrinolytic therapy; 37,143 receiving primary percutaneous coronary intervention) were admitted from January 1, 1999, through December 31, 2002, to hospitals participating in NRMI 3 and 4. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Minutes between hospital arrival and acute reperfusion therapy.
RESULTS: Door-to-drug times were significantly longer for patients identified as African American/black (41.1 minutes), Hispanic (36.1 minutes), and Asian/Pacific Islander (37.4 minutes), compared with patients identified as white (33.8 minutes) (P<.01 for all). Door-to-balloon times for patients identified as African American/black (122.3 minutes) or Hispanic (114.8 minutes) were significantly longer than for patients identified as white (103.4 minutes) (P<.001 for both). Racial/ethnic differences were still significant but were substantially reduced after accounting for differences in mean times to treatment for the hospitals in which patients were treated; significant racial/ethnic differences persisted after further adjustment for sociodemographic characteristics, insurance status, and clinical and hospital characteristics (P<.01 for all).
CONCLUSION: A substantial portion of the racial/ethnic disparity in time to treatment was accounted for by the specific hospital to which patients were admitted, in contrast to differential treatment by race/ethnicity inside the hospital.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15467058     DOI: 10.1001/jama.292.13.1563

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  75 in total

1.  Differences in admitting hospital characteristics for black and white Medicare beneficiaries with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Ioana Popescu; Peter Cram; Mary S Vaughan-Sarrazin
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Racial differences in short-term surgical outcomes following surgery for diverticulitis.

Authors:  Karim Alavi; J A Cervera-Servin; Paul R Sturrock; W B Sweeney; Justin A Maykel
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  National performance on door-in to door-out time among patients transferred for primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Jeph Herrin; Lauren E Miller; Dima F Turkmani; Wato Nsa; Elizabeth E Drye; Susannah M Bernheim; Shari M Ling; Michael T Rapp; Lein F Han; Dale W Bratzler; Elizabeth H Bradley; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; Henry H Ting; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2011-11-28

4.  Call to action: cardiovascular disease in Asian Americans: a science advisory from the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Latha P Palaniappan; Maria Rosario G Araneta; Themistocles L Assimes; Elizabeth L Barrett-Connor; Mercedes R Carnethon; Michael H Criqui; Gordon L Fung; K M Venkat Narayan; Hamang Patel; Ruth E Taylor-Piliae; Peter W F Wilson; Nathan D Wong
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  The effect of race and ethnicity on outcomes among patients in the intensive care unit: a comprehensive study involving socioeconomic status and resuscitation preferences.

Authors:  Sara E Erickson; Eduard E Vasilevskis; Michael W Kuzniewicz; Brian A Cason; Rondall K Lane; Mitzi L Dean; Deborah J Rennie; R Adams Dudley
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 7.598

6.  Racial variation in end-of-life intensive care use: a race or hospital effect?

Authors:  Amber E Barnato; Zekarias Berhane; Lisa A Weissfeld; Chung-Chou H Chang; Walter T Linde-Zwirble; Derek C Angus
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Separate but not equal: the consequences of segregated health care.

Authors:  Nancy R Kressin
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-10-25       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Race and surgical mortality in the United States.

Authors:  F L Lucas; Therese A Stukel; Arden M Morris; Andrea E Siewers; John D Birkmeyer
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 9.  Disparities in the provision of medical care: an outcome in search of an explanation.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Klonoff
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2009-01-06

10.  Sex and racial differences in the management of acute myocardial infarction, 1994 through 2002.

Authors:  Viola Vaccarino; Saif S Rathore; Nanette K Wenger; Paul D Frederick; Jerome L Abramson; Hal V Barron; Ajay Manhapra; Susmita Mallik; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-08-18       Impact factor: 91.245

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.