Literature DB >> 15466838

Narrowing the income gaps in preventive care for young children: families in healthy steps.

Kathryn Taafe McLearn1, Donna M Strobino, Cynthia S Minkovitz, Elisabeth Marks, David Bishai, William Hou.   

Abstract

Persistent unmet preventive and developmental health care needs of children in low-income families are a national concern. Recently, there have been efforts to promote developmental services as part of primary care for all young children. However, there is limited research to determine whether the neediest families are well in universal interventions. In our study, we assessed if disparities persist in utilization of developmental services, well child care, and satisfaction with care among low-, middle-, and high-income families participating in Healthy Steps for Young Children. Healthy Steps is a national experiment that incorporated developmental services into primary care for children from birth to 3 years of age. In the United States, 15 pediatric practices participated in this prospective study. At birth, 2,963 children were enrolled between September 1996 and November 1998 and followed through 33 months of age. The utilization of developmental services, satisfaction with care, and receipt of age-appropriate well child visits were measured at 30-33 months and adjusted for demographic and economic covariates. We found that the adjusted odds of low-income families did not differ from high-income families in receipt of four or more Healthy Steps services, a home visit, or discussing five or more child rearing topics. Low- and middle-income families had reduced adjusted odds of receiving a developmental assessment and books to read. The adjusted odds of low- and middle-income families did not differ from high-income families in being very satisfied with care provided or receiving age-appropriate well child visits. A universal practice-based intervention such as Healthy Steps has the potential to reduce income disparities in the utilization of preventive services, timely well child care, and satisfaction with care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15466838      PMCID: PMC3455931          DOI: 10.1093/jurban/jth140

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urban Health        ISSN: 1099-3460            Impact factor:   3.671


  22 in total

1.  American Academy of Pediatrics. The new morbidity revisited: a renewed commitment to the psychosocial aspects of pediatric care. Committee on Psychosocial Aspects of Child and Family Health.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Explaining trends in inequities: evidence from Brazilian child health studies.

Authors:  C G Victora; J P Vaughan; F C Barros; A C Silva; E Tomasi
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-09-23       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 3.  Developmental surveillance and screening of infants and young children.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 4.  Child development and pediatrics for the 21st century: the healthy steps approach.

Authors:  K T McLearn; B S Zuckerman; S Parker; M Yellowitz; M Kaplan-Sanoff
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.671

5.  The unmet health needs of America's children.

Authors:  P W Newacheck; D C Hughes; Y Y Hung; S Wong; J J Stoddard
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  Early effects of the healthy steps for young children program.

Authors:  C Minkovitz; D Strobino; N Hughart; D Scharfstein; B Guyer
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2001-04

7.  Well child care in the United States: racial differences in compliance with guidelines.

Authors:  D S Ronsaville; R B Hakim
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Children's health care use: a prospective investigation of factors related to care-seeking.

Authors:  D M Janicke; J W Finney; A W Riley
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Anticipatory guidance: what information do parents receive? What information do they want?

Authors:  M A Schuster; N Duan; M Regalado; D J Klein
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2000-12

10.  Listening to parents. A national survey of parents with young children.

Authors:  K T Young; K Davis; C Schoen; S Parker
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  1998-03
View more
  6 in total

1.  A study protocol testing the implementation, efficacy, and cost effectiveness of the ezParent program in pediatric primary care.

Authors:  Susan M Breitenstein; Michael Schoeny; Heather Risser; Tricia Johnson
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 2.226

2.  The parent-provider relationship: does race/ethnicity concordance or discordance influence parent reports of the receipt of high quality basic pediatric preventive services?

Authors:  Gregory D Stevens; Ritesh Mistry; Barry Zuckerman; Neal Halfon
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2005-10-12       Impact factor: 3.671

Review 3.  Well-child care clinical practice redesign for young children: a systematic review of strategies and tools.

Authors:  Tumaini R Coker; Annika Windon; Candice Moreno; Mark A Schuster; Paul J Chung
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Non-participation in preventive child health examinations at the general practitioner in Denmark: a register-based study.

Authors:  Grethe Søndergaard; Sofie Biering-Sørensen; Susan Ishøy Michelsen; Ole Schnor; Anne-Marie Nybo Andersen
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.581

5.  Implementation findings from an effectiveness-implementation trial of tablet-based parent training in pediatric primary care.

Authors:  Susan M Breitenstein; Stacy Laurent; Laura Pabalan; Heather J Risser; Pamela Roper; Mary T Saba; Michael Schoeny
Journal:  Fam Syst Health       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 1.950

Review 6.  Improving health and building human capital through an effective primary care system.

Authors:  Albert Lee; Andrew Kiyu; Helia Molina Milman; Jorge Jimenez
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.671

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.