Literature DB >> 15466731

Electrohydraulic high-energy shock-wave treatment for chronic plantar fasciitis.

John A Ogden1, Richard G Alvarez, Richard L Levitt, Jeffrey E Johnson, Marie E Marlow.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Plantar fasciitis is a common foot disorder that may be resistant to nonoperative treatment. This study evaluated the use of electrohydraulic high-energy shock waves in patients who failed to respond to a minimum of six months of antecedent nonoperative treatment.
METHODS: A randomized, placebo-controlled, multiply blinded, crossover study was conducted. Phase 1 consisted of twenty patients who were nonrandomized to treatment with extracorporeal shock waves to assess the phase-2 study protocol. In phase 2, 293 patients were randomized and an additional seventy-one patients were nonrandomized. Following ankle-block anesthesia, each patient received 100 graded shocks starting at 0.12 to 0.22 mJ/mm(2), followed by 1400 shocks at 0.22 mJ/mm(2) with use of a high-energy electrohydraulic shock-wave device. Patients in the placebo group received minimal subcutaneous anesthetic injections and nontransmitted shock waves by the same protocol. Three months later, patients were given the opportunity to continue without further treatment or have an additional treatment. This allowed a patient in the active treatment arm to receive a second treatment and a patient who received the placebo to cross over to the active treatment arm. Patients were followed at least one year after the final treatment.
RESULTS: Treatment was successful in seventeen of the twenty phase-1 patients at three months. This improved to nineteen (95%) of twenty patients at one year and was maintained at five years. In phase 2, three months after treatment, sixty-seven (47%) of the 144 actively treated patients had a completely successful result compared with forty-two (30%) of the 141 placebo-treated patients (p = 0.008). At one year, sixty-five of the sixty-seven actively treated, randomized patients maintained a successful result. Thirty-six (71%) of the remaining fifty-one nonrandomized patients had a successful result at three months. For all 289 patients who had one or more actual treatments, 222 (76.8%) had a good or excellent result. No patient was made worse by the procedure.
CONCLUSIONS: The application of electrohydraulic high-energy shock waves to the heel is a safe and effective noninvasive method to treat chronic plantar fasciitis, lasting up to and beyond one year.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15466731     DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200410000-00013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  21 in total

1.  Does extracorporeal shock wave therapy enhance healing of osteochondritis dissecans of the rabbit knee?: a pilot study.

Authors:  Roger Lyon; Xue Cheng Liu; Martin Kubin; Joseph Schwab
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Extracorporeal shock wave therapy in orthopaedic diseases.

Authors:  Suad Trebinjac; Emela Mujić-Skikić; Marina Ninković; Eldin Karaiković
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.363

Review 3.  Outcomes for patients with the same disease treated inside and outside of randomized trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Natasha Fernandes; Dianne Bryant; Lauren Griffith; Mohamed El-Rabbany; Nisha M Fernandes; Crystal Kean; Jacquelyn Marsh; Siddhi Mathur; Rebecca Moyer; Clare J Reade; John J Riva; Lyndsay Somerville; Neera Bhatnagar
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  A single application of low-energy radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy is effective for the management of chronic patellar tendinopathy.

Authors:  John P Furia; Jan D Rompe; Angelo Cacchio; Angelo Del Buono; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  [Extracorporeal shockwave therapy in the treatment of chronic insertional Achilles tendinopathy].

Authors:  J P Furia
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Resistant plantar fasciopathy: shock wave versus endoscopic plantar fascial release.

Authors:  Yasser A Radwan; Ali M Reda Mansour; Walid S Badawy
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Long-term outcome of low-energy extracorporeal shock wave therapy for plantar fasciitis: comparative analysis according to ultrasonographic findings.

Authors:  Jong-Wan Park; Kyungjae Yoon; Kwang-Soo Chun; Joon-Youn Lee; Hee-Jin Park; So-Yeon Lee; Yong-Taek Lee
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2014-08-28

Review 8.  Extracorporeal shockwave therapy in musculoskeletal disorders.

Authors:  Ching-Jen Wang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 2.359

9.  The effect of extracorporeal shock wave therapy on myofascial pain syndrome.

Authors:  Jong Hyun Jeon; Yun Jae Jung; Ju Youn Lee; Ji Soo Choi; Jeong Hyeon Mun; Won Yong Park; Cheong Hoon Seo; Ki Un Jang
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2012-10-31

Review 10.  Outcomes of patients who participate in randomized controlled trials compared to similar patients receiving similar interventions who do not participate.

Authors:  Gunn Elisabeth Vist; Dianne Bryant; Lyndsay Somerville; Trevor Birminghem; Andrew D Oxman
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-07-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.