Literature DB >> 1546592

Sonographic detection of the normal and abnormal appendix.

M Rioux1.   

Abstract

A prospective study of 170 patients with suspected appendicitis was performed to assess the value of sonography in detecting the normal and abnormal appendix. The wall thickness (normal, less than or equal to 3 mm), compressibility of the appendix, and echogenicity of surrounding fat were the primary criteria used to determine the status of the appendix. Of 60 patients who underwent surgery, appendicitis was proved in 45. The remaining 110 patients who did not have surgery, contacted by telephone at the end of the study, had no clinical follow-up evidence of acute appendicitis. A normal appendix was clearly identified in 102 (82%) of 125 patients without acute appendicitis. The sensitivity of sonographic examination in detecting appendicitis was 93%, the specificity was 94%, and the accuracy was 94%. The predictive value of a positive test was 86%; that of a negative test was 98%. Ruptured appendicitis was predicted in all cases (11/11). Sonography is useful in detecting acute appendicitis and can clearly show the normal appendix more frequently than previously reported.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1546592     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.158.4.1546592

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  28 in total

1.  Ultrasound appearances in chronic appendicitis.

Authors:  J M Wide; G Lamont; A Boothroyd
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 2.  Ultrasound of the pediatric appendix.

Authors:  Preetam Gongidi; Richard D Bellah
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2017-08-04

3.  A critical evaluation of US for the diagnosis of pediatric acute appendicitis in a real-life setting: how can we improve the diagnostic value of sonography?

Authors:  Andrew T Trout; Ramon Sanchez; Maria F Ladino-Torres; Deepa R Pai; Peter J Strouse
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2012-03-09

4.  Artificial neural networks: useful aid in diagnosing acute appendicitis.

Authors:  S G Prabhudesai; S Gould; S Rekhraj; P P Tekkis; G Glazer; P Ziprin
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Ultrasound morphology of cecal appendix in pet rabbits.

Authors:  Annalisa Nicoletti; Nicola Di Girolamo; Ulrich Zeyen; Paolo Selleri; Marco Masi; Paolo Fonti
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2018-08-10

6.  US examination of the appendix in children with suspected appendicitis: the additional value of secondary signs.

Authors:  Fraukje Wiersma; Boudewijn R Toorenvliet; Johan L Bloem; Jan Hein Allema; Herma C Holscher
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  The equivocal appendix at CT: prevalence in a control population.

Authors:  Emily M Webb; Zhen J Wang; Fergus V Coakley; Liina Poder; Antonio C Westphalen; Benjamin M Yeh
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2009-07-14

8.  Profiles of US and CT imaging features with a high probability of appendicitis.

Authors:  A van Randen; W Laméris; H W van Es; W ten Hove; W H Bouma; M S van Leeuwen; E M van Keulen; V P M van der Hulst; O D Henneman; P M Bossuyt; M A Boermeester; J Stoker
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-01-30       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  The Analysis of Mean Platelet Volume and Platelet Distribution Width Levels in Appendicitis.

Authors:  Akin Aydogan; Seckin Akkucuk; Secil Arica; Sedat Motor; Ali Karakus; Orhan Veli Ozkan; Ibrahim Yetim; Muhyittin Temiz
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 0.656

10.  Sonographic appearance of primary small bowel carcinoid tumor.

Authors:  M Rioux; P Langis; F Naud
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  1995 Jan-Feb
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.