Literature DB >> 15465614

Validating electronic source data in clinical trials.

Ronald G Marks1.   

Abstract

The clinical trials industry relies heavily on paper-based source documents as the foundation for the collection of its clinical research data from human subjects and medical records. This focus on paper documents has been prevalent throughout the history of clinical trials conduct, even as computing solutions advanced throughout the past 20 years. With the advent of additional electronic capabilities recently with the growth of Internet-based products to enhance business operations in many fields, the clinical trials industry remains uniquely behind most other industries in electronic technology adoptions. Valid reasons exist for the slow growth of technology adoptions in clinical trial activities, but there are now discussions about how to use technology more effectively in clinical trial conduct. One area of enhanced clinical trial conduct is believed to be available by moving from paper-based source documents to electronic source documents, that is, eliminating paper from clinical data capture, and collecting the information initially in a computer system. An important concern in moving to electronic source data is the validation of such data. This paper summarizes the history of clinical data capture through paper and electronic advancements to date and identifies three reasons for the slow movement to more electronic source data. The paper then illustrates two methods for the validation of electronic source data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15465614     DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2004.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Control Clin Trials        ISSN: 0197-2456


  10 in total

1.  A data accounting system for clinical investigators.

Authors:  T Michael Kashner; Robert Hinson; Gloria J Holland; Don D Mickey; Keith Hoffman; Lisa Lind; Linda D Johnson; Barbara K Chang; Richard M Golden; Steven S Henley
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2007-04-25       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Innovative Digital Tools and Surveillance Systems for the Timely Detection of Adverse Events at the Point of Care: A Proof-of-Concept Study.

Authors:  Christian Hoppe; Patrick Obermeier; Susann Muehlhans; Maren Alchikh; Lea Seeber; Franziska Tief; Katharina Karsch; Xi Chen; Sindy Boettcher; Sabine Diedrich; Tim Conrad; Bron Kisler; Barbara Rath
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 5.606

3.  Development and use of a web-based data management system for a randomized clinical trial of adolescents and young adults.

Authors:  Beverly S Musick; Sheri L Robb; Debra S Burns; Kristin Stegenga; Ming Yan; Kathy J McCorkle; Joan E Haase
Journal:  Comput Inform Nurs       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.985

4.  Severe traumatic brain injury in Austria I: introduction to the study.

Authors:  Martin Rusnak; Ivan Janciak; Marek Majdan; Ingrid Wilbacher; Walter Mauritz
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.704

5.  Porting a cancer treatment prediction to a mobile device.

Authors:  Tim Gegg-Harrison; Mingrui Zhang; Nan Meng; Zhifii Sun; Ping Yang
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2009

Review 6.  The Internet and clinical trials: background, online resources, examples and issues.

Authors:  James Paul; Rachael Seib; Todd Prescott
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2005-03-16       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  The use of electronic data capture tools in clinical trials: Web-survey of 259 Canadian trials.

Authors:  Khaled El Emam; Elizabeth Jonker; Margaret Sampson; Karmela Krleza-Jerić; Angelica Neisa
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2009-03-09       Impact factor: 5.428

8.  Double-blind control of the data manager doesn't have any impact on data entry reliability and should be considered as an avoidable cost.

Authors:  Davide Mauri; Vasiliki Karampoiki; Jacopo Mauri; Konstantinos Kamposioras; Georgios Alexiou; Georgios Ferentinos; Lamprini Tsali; Ioanna Karathanasi; Christina Peponi
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2008-10-20       Impact factor: 4.615

9.  Comparison of two data collection processes in clinical studies: electronic and paper case report forms.

Authors:  Anaïs Le Jeannic; Céline Quelen; Corinne Alberti; Isabelle Durand-Zaleski
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  A SOA-Based Platform to Support Clinical Data Sharing.

Authors:  R Gazzarata; B Giannini; M Giacomini
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 2.682

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.