Literature DB >> 15465370

Is routine intravascular shunting necessary for carotid endarterectomy in patients with contralateral occlusion? A review of 5-year experience of carotid endarterectomy with local anaesthesia.

B Cinar1, O S Goksel, C Karatepe, S Kut, H Aydogan, U Filizcan, S Cetemen, T Coruh, E Eren.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Endarterectomy of a stenotic internal carotid artery in the presence of contralateral carotid occlusion (CCO) is often assessed as a high-risk procedure. We have assessed the requirement for shunting in patients with CCO operated under local anaesthetic.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 1998 and 2003, 429 patients (319 males and 110 females, mean age 65.7+/-6.2, range 48-84) underwent 500 carotid endarterectomies under local anaesthetic with awake neurological testing. Fifty-five patients (12.8%) had CCO. Preoperative risk factors, intra- and postoperative events were noted and analyzed. Short-term and mid-term follow-up (mean 16.4+/-5.8 months, range 3-38 months) was also recorded.
RESULTS: The rate of shunting in patients with or without CCO (10.9% vs. 9.1%) was not significantly different. Stroke rates for CCO and non-CCO groups were 3.6 and 0.5%, respectively. Only the presence of preoperative cerebral infarction increased the risk of stroke. Patients that needed shunting were found to have significantly higher overall rate of adverse events, mortality and stroke.
CONCLUSIONS: Routine use of intravascular shunting for a stenotic carotid artery with contralateral occlusion may not be necessary. The choice of using a shunt is safe when made intraoperatively by assessing the neurological status of the patient continuously. This requires expertise and strong cooperation between the anaesthesiologist and the surgical teams.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15465370     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2004.07.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg        ISSN: 1078-5884            Impact factor:   7.069


  6 in total

1.  Cerebral hemodynamic benefits after contralateral carotid artery stenting in patients with internal carotid artery occlusion.

Authors:  F Oka; H Ishihara; S Kato; M Higashi; M Suzuki
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Impact of practice patterns in shunt use during carotid endarterectomy with contralateral carotid occlusion.

Authors:  Philip P Goodney; Jessica B Wallaert; Salvatore T Scali; David H Stone; Virendra Patel; Palma Shaw; Brian W Nolan; Jack L Cronenwett
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 4.268

3.  Preoperative magnetic resonance angiography as a predictive test for cerebral ischemia during carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  Sung Shin; Tae-Won Kwon; Yong-Pil Cho; Ji Hoon Shin; Ann Yi; Hyangkyung Kim; Geun Eun Kim
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Oxidative Stress and Total Antioxidant Status During Internal Carotid Artery Clamping with or without Shunting: An Experimental Pilot Study.

Authors:  Anastasios Papapetrou; Demetrios Moris; Nikolaos Patelis; George N Kouvelos; Chris Bakogiannis; Chris Klonaris; Sotiris Georgopoulos
Journal:  Med Sci Monit Basic Res       Date:  2015-09-22

5.  Contralateral occlusion increases the risk of neurological complications associated with carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  Laura Capoccia; Enrico Sbarigia; Anna Rita Rizzo; Chiara Pranteda; Danilo Menna; Pasqualino Sirignano; Wassim Mansour; Andrea Esposito; Francesco Speziale
Journal:  Int J Vasc Med       Date:  2015-01-29

6.  Surgical Management of a Patient with an Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis, Eagle Syndrome, and Internal Carotid Artery Tortuosity: A Case of Four Pathologies of the Carotid Arteries.

Authors:  Grigol Keshelava; Rati Kurdadze; Devi Tsiklauri
Journal:  EJVES Vasc Forum       Date:  2021-01-20
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.