PURPOSE: To investigate the appropriateness of the treatment policy of stereotactic irradiation using both hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HSRT) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) located in an eloquent region or for large AVMs and using SRS alone for the other AVMs. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Included in this study were 75 AVMs in 72 patients, with a mean follow-up of 52 months. Of the 75 AVMs, 33 were located in eloquent regions or were >2.5 cm in maximal diameter and were given 25-35 Gy (mean, 32.4 Gy) in four daily fractions at a single isocenter if the patient agreed to prolonged wearing of the stereotactic frame for 5 days. The other 42 AVMs were treated with SRS at a dose of 15-25 Gy (mean, 24.1 Gy) at the isocenter. The 75 AVMs were classified according to the Spetzler-Martin grading system; 21, 23, 28, 2, and 1 AVM were Grade I, II, III, IV, V, and VI, respectively. RESULTS: The overall actuarial rate of obliteration was 43% (95% confidence interval [CI], 30-56%) at 3 years, 72% (95% CI, 58-86%) at 5 years, and 78% (95% CI, 63-93%) at 6 years. The actuarial obliteration rate at 5 years was 79% for the 42 AVMs <2.0 cm and 66% for the 33 AVMs >2 cm. The 5- and 6-year actuarial obliteration rate was 61% (95% CI, 39-83%) and 71% (95% CI, 47-95%), respectively, after HSRT and 81% (95% CI, 66-96%) and 81% (95% CI, 66-96%), respectively, after SRS; the difference was not statistically significant. Radiation-induced necrosis was observed in 4 subjects in the SRS group and 1 subject in the HSRT group. Cyst formation occurred in 3 patients in the SRS group and no patient in the HSRT group. A permanent symptomatic complication was observed in 3 cases (4.2%), and 1 of the 3 was fatal. All 3 patients were in the SRS group. The annual intracranial hemorrhage rate was 5.5-5.6% for all patients. CONCLUSION: Our treatment policy using SRS and HSRT was as effective as the policy involving SRS alone. The HSRT schedule was suggested to have a lower frequency of radiation necrosis and cyst formation than the high-dose SRS schedule. The benefit of HSRT compared with lower dose SRS has not yet been determined.
PURPOSE: To investigate the appropriateness of the treatment policy of stereotactic irradiation using both hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HSRT) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) located in an eloquent region or for large AVMs and using SRS alone for the other AVMs. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Included in this study were 75 AVMs in 72 patients, with a mean follow-up of 52 months. Of the 75 AVMs, 33 were located in eloquent regions or were >2.5 cm in maximal diameter and were given 25-35 Gy (mean, 32.4 Gy) in four daily fractions at a single isocenter if the patient agreed to prolonged wearing of the stereotactic frame for 5 days. The other 42 AVMs were treated with SRS at a dose of 15-25 Gy (mean, 24.1 Gy) at the isocenter. The 75 AVMs were classified according to the Spetzler-Martin grading system; 21, 23, 28, 2, and 1 AVM were Grade I, II, III, IV, V, and VI, respectively. RESULTS: The overall actuarial rate of obliteration was 43% (95% confidence interval [CI], 30-56%) at 3 years, 72% (95% CI, 58-86%) at 5 years, and 78% (95% CI, 63-93%) at 6 years. The actuarial obliteration rate at 5 years was 79% for the 42 AVMs <2.0 cm and 66% for the 33 AVMs >2 cm. The 5- and 6-year actuarial obliteration rate was 61% (95% CI, 39-83%) and 71% (95% CI, 47-95%), respectively, after HSRT and 81% (95% CI, 66-96%) and 81% (95% CI, 66-96%), respectively, after SRS; the difference was not statistically significant. Radiation-induced necrosis was observed in 4 subjects in the SRS group and 1 subject in the HSRT group. Cyst formation occurred in 3 patients in the SRS group and no patient in the HSRT group. A permanent symptomatic complication was observed in 3 cases (4.2%), and 1 of the 3 was fatal. All 3 patients were in the SRS group. The annual intracranial hemorrhage rate was 5.5-5.6% for all patients. CONCLUSION: Our treatment policy using SRS and HSRT was as effective as the policy involving SRS alone. The HSRT schedule was suggested to have a lower frequency of radiation necrosis and cyst formation than the high-dose SRS schedule. The benefit of HSRT compared with lower dose SRS has not yet been determined.
Authors: Newsha Raoufi-Rad; Lucinda S McRobb; Vivienne S Lee; David Bervini; Michael Grace; Jaysree Ukath; Joshua Mchattan; Varun K A Sreenivasan; T T Hong Duong; Zhenjun Zhao; Marcus A Stoodley Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-09-26 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Peter Lindvall; Per Bergström; Per-Olov Löfroth; Roger Henriksson; A Tommy Bergenheim Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2008-05-28 Impact factor: 3.481
Authors: Evandro C Sousa; Manoel J Teixeira; Ronnie L Piske; Lavoisier S Albuquerque; Sebastião Côrrea; Salomão Benabou; Leonardo C Welling; Leonardo Moura de Sousa; Eberval Gadelha Figueiredo Journal: Front Surg Date: 2016-06-28