Literature DB >> 15465199

Differential cyclooxygenase-2 expression in squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix.

Yong Bae Kim1, Gwi Eon Kim, Hong Ryull Pyo, Nam Hoon Cho, Ki Chang Keum, Chang Geol Lee, Jinsil Seong, Chang Ok Suh, Tchan Kyu Park.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the differential expression of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) in patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma (ADC) of the uterine cervix and the prognostic significance of COX-2 expression in these histologic types. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 105 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Stage IIB uterine cervical cancer patients were screened for COX-2 expression immunohistochemically. COX-2 expression was determined in invasive cervical SCC (n = 84) and invasive cervical ADC (n = 21). To determine the clinical significance of COX-2 expression by histologic type, the patients were arbitrarily divided into four groups: SCC/COX-2 negative (n = 64); SCC/COX-2 positive (n = 20); ADC/COX-2 negative (n = 9); and ADC/COX-2 positive (n = 12). The clinical response to treatment, patterns of treatment failure, and survival data by COX-2 expression were compared for these two major histologic types. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the prognostic factors influencing survival.
RESULTS: Immunohistochemical examination showed that COX-2 expression was more frequently observed in ADC than in SCC (57% vs. 24%, p = 0.007). Moreover, COX-2 expression was an important predictor of treatment response, irrespective of the histologic type. All COX-2-negative patients achieved complete remission after initial treatment; 17% of SCC patients and 33% of ADC patients with COX-2 expression did not have complete remission after the initial treatment. The incidence of local failure for those with COX-2 expression was significantly greater than for COX-2-negative patients, regardless of histologic type. With a minimal follow-up of 60 months, the overall 5-year actuarial survival rate for SCC and ADC patients was 79% and 62%, respectively (p = 0.05). The 5-year disease-free survival rate for SCC and ADC patients was 73% and 56%, respectively (p = 0.13). Irrespective of the pathologic type, COX-2-positive patients had an unfavorable prognosis. The overall 5-year actuarial survival rate was 57% for COX-2-positive patients and 83% for COX-2-negative patients (p = 0.001). When patients were stratified into the four groups according to histologic type and COX-2 expression status, ADC/COX-2-positive patients had the worst prognosis, with an overall 5-year actuarial survival rate of 49% compared with 78% for ADC/COX-2-negative patients, 62% for SCC/COX-2-positive, and 84% for SCC/COX-2-negative patients (p = 0.007, log-rank test). Irrespective of histologic type, COX-2 expression was an independent prognostic factor by univariate and multivariate analyses.
CONCLUSION: In uterine cervical cancer, COX-2 was expressed in a greater proportion of ADC patients than SCC patients. COX-2 expression was also identified as a major determiner of a poor response to treatment and of an unfavorable prognosis, irrespective of the histologic type, reflecting the importance of the COX-2 protein in the acquisition of biologic aggressiveness and more malignant phenotype or increased resistance to the standard chemotherapy and radiotherapy in both histologic types. Given these observations, we believe that that ADC/COX-2-positive patients might be appropriate candidates for future trials of selective COX-2 inhibitor adjunctive therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15465199     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.04.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  12 in total

1.  Early response evaluation and prediction in neoadjuvant-treated patients with esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Joerg Theisen; Bernd Krause; Christian Peschel; Roland Schmid; Hans Geinitz; Helmut Friess
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-11-30

2.  Comparison of clinical outcomes of squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, and adenosquamous carcinoma of the uterine cervix after definitive radiotherapy: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  Juan Zhou; San-Gang Wu; Jia-Yuan Sun; Feng-Yan Li; Huan-Xin Lin; Qiong-Hua Chen; Zhen-Yu He
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  Shotgun Lipidomics for Differential Diagnosis of HPV-Associated Cervix Transformation.

Authors:  Natalia L Starodubtseva; Vitaliy V Chagovets; Maria E Nekrasova; Niso M Nazarova; Alisa O Tokareva; Olga V Bourmenskaya; Djamilja I Attoeva; Eugenii N Kukaev; Dmitriy Y Trofimov; Vladimir E Frankevich; Gennady T Sukhikh
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2022-05-31

4.  Candidate biomarkers for cervical cancer treatment: Potential for clinical practice (Review).

Authors:  Miho Iida; Kouji Banno; Megumi Yanokura; Kanako Nakamura; Masataka Adachi; Yuya Nogami; Kiyoko Umene; Kenta Masuda; Iori Kisu; Takashi Iwata; Kyoko Tanaka; Daisuke Aoki
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-06-23

5.  Clinical outcomes of adjuvant radiation therapy and prognostic factors in early stage uterine cervical cancer.

Authors:  Hyun Ju Kim; Woo Joong Rhee; Seo Hee Choi; Eun Ji Nam; Sang Wun Kim; Sunghoon Kim; Young Tae Kim; Gwi Eon Kim; Yong Bae Kim
Journal:  Radiat Oncol J       Date:  2015-06-30

6.  A prognostic nomogram integrating novel biomarkers identified by machine learning for cervical squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Yimin Li; Shun Lu; Mei Lan; Xinhao Peng; Zijian Zhang; Jinyi Lang
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 5.531

7.  The effect of cyclooxygenase-2 expression on tumor volume response in patients treated with radiotherapy for uterine cervical cancer.

Authors:  Min Kyu Kang; Won Park; Yoon-La Choi; Eun Yoon Cho; Geunghwan Ahn; Heerim Nam; Seung Jae Huh; Yong Chan Ahn; Do Hoon Lim; Dong Ryul Oh; Duk Soo Bae; Byoung Gie Kim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2009-11-09       Impact factor: 2.153

8.  Clinicopathological Significance of VEGF-C, VEGFR-3 and Cyclooxygenase-2 in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Xiaoyan Shi; Ling Xi; Danhui Weng; Gang Chen; Xiaohong Song; Peng Wu; Beibei Wang; Juncheng Wei; Shixuan Wang; Jianfeng Zhou; Ding Ma
Journal:  Int J Biomed Sci       Date:  2008-03

9.  Predicting the response of localised oesophageal cancer to neo-adjuvant chemoradiation.

Authors:  Charles M Gillham; John Reynolds; Donal Hollywood
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-08-23       Impact factor: 2.754

Review 10.  Emerging biological treatments for uterine cervical carcinoma.

Authors:  Patrizia Vici; Luciano Mariani; Laura Pizzuti; Domenico Sergi; Luigi Di Lauro; Enrico Vizza; Federica Tomao; Silverio Tomao; Emanuela Mancini; Cristina Vincenzoni; Maddalena Barba; Marcello Maugeri-Saccà; Giuseppe Giovinazzo; Aldo Venuti
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2014-01-05       Impact factor: 4.207

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.