BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The late morbidity of a randomized study was analyzed after a follow up of 2 years. The difference in intestinal morbidity was analyzed as a function of the treatment arm and dose volume parameters. The correlation with acute toxicity and (pre-existing) bowel complaints was investigated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 266 T1-4N0M0prostate cancer patients were randomized for conventional (open fields) and 3D conformal radiotherapy using beams eye view blocked fields with the same dose (66 Gy) and gross target volume-planning target volume margin (15 mm). Apart from the RTOG toxicity scoring system a patient self-assessment questionnaire was used to obtain detailed information on morbidity. RESULTS: At 2 years there is only a trend for less rectal toxicity (grade >/=1) in favor of the conformal radiotherapy (grade 1, 47 versus 40% and grade 2, 10 versus 7% for conventional and conformal radiotherapy, respectively (P=0.1). A significant relation was found between late rectal toxicity (grade >/=1) and the volume of the anus and rectum exposed to >/=90% tumor dose (TD). A highly significant relationship is observed between acute rectum and anal toxicity and late rectal toxicity. The patient self-assessment questionnaire analysis revealed that patients are most bothered by compliance related symptoms like urgency, soiling and fecal loss. In a multivariate analysis, all other variables loose significance, when anal volume exposed to >/=90% TD and pre-treatment defaecation frequency are accounted for. Late anal toxicity is low and related only to acute anal toxicity. Late bladder toxicity is related solely to pre-treatment frequency and overall urological symptoms. The incidence of grade 2 toxicity increases with a factor 2.5-4 when (stool or urine) frequency is unfavorable at the start of treatment. CONCLUSIONS:Conformal radiotherapy at the dose level of 66 Gy does not significantly decrease the incidence of rectal, anal and bladder toxicity compared to conventional radiotherapy. There is a significant relationship between acute and late toxicity and the anal volume exposed to 90% TD. Intestinal (and urological) symptoms at start have a major impact on late toxicity.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The late morbidity of a randomized study was analyzed after a follow up of 2 years. The difference in intestinal morbidity was analyzed as a function of the treatment arm and dose volume parameters. The correlation with acute toxicity and (pre-existing) bowel complaints was investigated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 266 T1-4N0M0 prostate cancerpatients were randomized for conventional (open fields) and 3D conformal radiotherapy using beams eye view blocked fields with the same dose (66 Gy) and gross target volume-planning target volume margin (15 mm). Apart from the RTOG toxicity scoring system a patient self-assessment questionnaire was used to obtain detailed information on morbidity. RESULTS: At 2 years there is only a trend for less rectal toxicity (grade >/=1) in favor of the conformal radiotherapy (grade 1, 47 versus 40% and grade 2, 10 versus 7% for conventional and conformal radiotherapy, respectively (P=0.1). A significant relation was found between late rectal toxicity (grade >/=1) and the volume of the anus and rectum exposed to >/=90% tumor dose (TD). A highly significant relationship is observed between acute rectum and anal toxicity and late rectal toxicity. The patient self-assessment questionnaire analysis revealed that patients are most bothered by compliance related symptoms like urgency, soiling and fecal loss. In a multivariate analysis, all other variables loose significance, when anal volume exposed to >/=90% TD and pre-treatment defaecation frequency are accounted for. Late anal toxicity is low and related only to acute anal toxicity. Late bladder toxicity is related solely to pre-treatment frequency and overall urological symptoms. The incidence of grade 2 toxicity increases with a factor 2.5-4 when (stool or urine) frequency is unfavorable at the start of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Conformal radiotherapy at the dose level of 66 Gy does not significantly decrease the incidence of rectal, anal and bladder toxicity compared to conventional radiotherapy. There is a significant relationship between acute and late toxicity and the anal volume exposed to 90% TD. Intestinal (and urological) symptoms at start have a major impact on late toxicity.
Authors: Robin Krol; Robert Jan Smeenk; Emile N J T van Lin; Eric E K Yeoh; Wim P M Hopman Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2013-10-23 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: Jose Luis Lopez Guerra; Nicolas Isa; Raul Matute; Moises Russo; Fernando Puebla; Michelle Miran Kim; Alberto Sanchez-Reyes; Cesar Beltran; Javier Jaen; Celine Bourgier; Hugo Marsiglia Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2012-07-24 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Theresa A Lawrie; John T Green; Mark Beresford; Linda Wedlake; Sorrel Burden; Susan E Davidson; Simon Lal; Caroline C Henson; H Jervoise N Andreyev Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2018-01-23
Authors: Irene M Lips; Homan Dehnad; Carla H van Gils; Arto E Boeken Kruger; Uulke A van der Heide; Marco van Vulpen Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2008-05-21 Impact factor: 3.481
Authors: Tengbin Xiong; Rebecca M Turner; Yinghui Wei; David E Neal; Georgios Lyratzopoulos; Julian P T Higgins Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2014-05-15 Impact factor: 2.692