Literature DB >> 15465068

Psychosocial influences on 305 adults' survival after bone marrow transplantation; depression, smoking, and behavioral self-regulation.

Flora Hoodin1, Karen R Kalbfleisch, James Thornton, Voravit Ratanatharathorn.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The role of psychological factors in adult survival after bone marrow transplant (BMT) has not been adequately established. BMT survival rates have been shown to depend largely on disease and demographic variables. With sample sizes no larger than 123, the majority of psychosocial studies found little definitive statistical evidence that mood, marital/cohabiting status, coping styles, or smoking affect survival. The purpose of this study was to comprehensively examine the relative contribution of psychological variables to survival after BMT in a unified model, controlling for medical and demographic variables.
METHODS: Pre-BMT, 305 consecutive patients were psychologically assessed with interview and Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI). Transplant Evaluation Rating Scale (TERS) ratings were assigned retrospectively by two raters (interrater reliability r=.89). We employed a fully parametric, accelerated failure time regression model (Weibull), which provides richer extrapolation and interpretation than the semiparametric Cox proportional hazards regression model.
RESULTS: Overall our results indicate that for a given medical condition, the type of BMT patient likely to survive longest was a young, married, educated, European-American, nonsmoker who was more defiant, better adjusted, and less depressed. Moreover, the longer a patient survived, the smaller the probability of dying in the short run.
CONCLUSIONS: This study, the first large-scale statistical analysis using a fully parametric model (Weibull), provides evidence that select psychosocial variables can affect BMT survival. Future investigations could explore possible mediating variables, and whether identifying high-risk individuals pretreatment could enhance resource allocation, psychological intervention, and possibly even survival itself.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15465068     DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3999(03)00599-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychosom Res        ISSN: 0022-3999            Impact factor:   3.006


  11 in total

Review 1.  Biobehavioral influences on cancer progression.

Authors:  Erin S Costanzo; Anil K Sood; Susan K Lutgendorf
Journal:  Immunol Allergy Clin North Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.479

2.  Psychosocial risk predicts high readmission rates for hematopoietic cell transplant recipients.

Authors:  Daniel R Richardson; Ying Huang; Heather L McGinty; Patrick Elder; Joanna Newlin; Cyndi Kirkendall; Leslie Andritsos; Don Benson; William Blum; Yvonne Efebera; Sam Penza; Craig Hofmeister; Samantha Jaglowski; Rebecca Klisovic; Sumithira Vasu; Basem William; Steven Devine; Ashley E Rosko
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 5.483

3.  Substance use and survival after treatment for chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS).

Authors:  Grace Chang; Mary-Ellen Meadows; Jennifer A Jones; Joseph H Antin; E John Orav
Journal:  Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.829

4.  Depression and cancer mortality: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  M Pinquart; P R Duberstein
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 7.723

5.  The impact of smoking on outcomes among patients undergoing hematopoietic SCT for the treatment of acute leukemia.

Authors:  S L Ehlers; D A Gastineau; C A Patten; P A Decker; S M Rausch; J R Cerhan; W J Hogan; J O Ebbert; L F Porrata
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 5.483

6.  Health-related quality of life as a prognostic factor in patients with advanced cancer.

Authors:  Jennifer L Steel; David A Geller; Tiana L Robinson; Alexandra Y Savkova; Deborah S Brower; J Wallis Marsh; Allan Tsung
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  The Transplant Evaluation Rating Scale predicts overall survival after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Melhem M Solh; Dawn Speckhart; Scott R Solomon; Asad Bashey; Lawrence E Morris; Xu Zhang; H Kent Holland
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-10-13

8.  Variation in supportive care practices in hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Authors:  Stephanie J Lee; Claudia C Astigarraga; Mary Eapen; Andrew S Artz; Stella M Davies; Richard Champlin; Madan Jagasia; Nancy A Kernan; Fausto R Loberiza; Margaret Bevans; Robert J Soiffer; Steven Joffe
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Psychosocial factors predicting survival after allogeneic stem cell transplant.

Authors:  Brindha Pillay; Stuart J Lee; Lynda Katona; Sue Burney; Sharon Avery
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  Do coping and social support predict depression and anxiety in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation?

Authors:  Kristen J Wells; Margaret Booth-Jones; Paul B Jacobsen
Journal:  J Psychosoc Oncol       Date:  2009
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.