Literature DB >> 15464130

The search for the neurobiological basis of vulnerability to drug abuse: using microarrays to investigate the role of stress and individual differences.

M Kabbaj1, S Evans, S J Watson, H Akil.   

Abstract

Basic neurobiological studies have led to great progress in our understanding of the mechanisms of action of drugs of abuse. Much has been learned about the brain response from the moment a psychoactive drug enters the organism onwards, including the psychological, neurobiological and peripheral effects of repeated drug administration, withdrawal and re-exposure. However, to relate this knowledge to the human experience requires further research on the antecedents of drug-taking behavior and the factors that predispose particular individuals to drug seeking and drug abuse. Thus, it is important to address several issues at the fundamental level: (1) Why are some individuals more vulnerable to drugs of abuse more than others? Is there a broader dimension or dimensions of emotional reactivity that contribute to this difference in vulnerability? (2) What is the effect of psychosocial stress on drug-seeking and drug-taking behavior, and are the effects distinct across individuals? (3) Since both drug-taking behavior and stress have sustained and pervasive effects on the brain, can we use microarrays to discern the "neural signature" or "neural phenotype" associated with these processes, and can we distinguish this signature across individuals with differing propensities to taking drugs? In the present paper, we summarize some of our early attempts at addressing these questions. We rely on animal studies aimed at characterizing the emotional and stress reactivity of rats with different propensities to self-administer drugs (high responders and low responders); we briefly describe the effect of a psychosocial stressor on these animals; we then detail a study using microarray technology aimed at investigating the "neural phenotype" associated with social defeat stress in the high vs. low responder animals. This "discovery" approach is used as a starting place for identifying novel mechanisms that might alter the vulnerability of different individuals to drug-seeking behavior. The power and limits of this approach, and its future directions, are discussed within this general framework.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15464130     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2004.07.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropharmacology        ISSN: 0028-3908            Impact factor:   5.250


  22 in total

1.  Individual differences in vulnerability for self-injurious behavior: studies using an animal model.

Authors:  Amber M Muehlmann; Jennifer A Wilkinson; Darragh P Devine
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  The effects of novelty-seeking phenotypes and sex differences on acquisition of cocaine self-administration in selectively bred High-Responder and Low-Responder rats.

Authors:  Brooke A Davis; Sarah M Clinton; Huda Akil; Jill B Becker
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2008-03-25       Impact factor: 3.533

3.  Basal microRNA expression patterns in reward circuitry of selectively bred high-responder and low-responder rats vary by brain region and genotype.

Authors:  David E Hamilton; Christopher L Cooke; Bradley S Carter; Huda Akil; Stanley J Watson; Robert C Thompson
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 3.107

Review 4.  Epigenetic mechanisms underlying the role of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in depression and response to antidepressants.

Authors:  Florian Duclot; Mohamed Kabbaj
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  Developmental underpinnings of differences in rodent novelty-seeking and emotional reactivity.

Authors:  Sarah M Clinton; John D H Stead; Sue Miller; Stanley J Watson; Huda Akil
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 3.386

6.  Molecular Signatures of Psychosocial Stress and Cognition Are Modulated by Chronic Lithium Treatment.

Authors:  Magdalena M Brzózka; Ursula Havemann-Reinecke; Sven P Wichert; Peter Falkai; Moritz J Rossner
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 9.306

7.  Cocaine interacts with the novelty-seeking trait to modulate FGFR1 gene expression in the rat.

Authors:  Cortney A Turner; Shelly B Flagel; Sarah M Clinton; Huda Akil; Stanley J Watson
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  Prenatal stress does not alter innate novelty-seeking behavioral traits, but differentially affects individual differences in neuroendocrine stress responsivity.

Authors:  Sarah Clinton; Sue Miller; Stanley J Watson; Huda Akil
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.905

9.  Genome-wide gene expression profiling in GluR1 knockout mice: key role of the calcium signaling pathway in glutamatergically mediated hippocampal transmission.

Authors:  Rulun Zhou; Andrew Holmes; Jing Du; Oz Malkesman; Peixiong Yuan; Yun Wang; Patricia Damschroder-Williams; Guang Chen; Xavier Guitart; Husseini K Manji
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 3.386

Review 10.  Behavioral characteristics and neurobiological substrates shared by Pavlovian sign-tracking and drug abuse.

Authors:  Arthur Tomie; Kathryn L Grimes; Larissa A Pohorecky
Journal:  Brain Res Rev       Date:  2007-12-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.