| Literature DB >> 15461785 |
Jean-Luc Boevé1, Véronique Ducarme, Tanguy Mertens, Philippe Bouillard, Sergio Angeli.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Several sawfly larvae of the Tenthredinidae (Hymenoptera) are called easy bleeders because their whole body integument, except the head capsule, disrupts very easily at a given spot, under a slight mechanical stress at this spot. The exuding haemolymph droplet acts as a feeding deterrent towards invertebrate predators. The present study aimed to describe the cuticle surface, to consider it from a mechanistic point of view, and to discuss potential consequences of the integument surface in the predator-prey relationships.Entities:
Year: 2004 PMID: 15461785 PMCID: PMC524519 DOI: 10.1186/1477-3155-2-10
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Nanobiotechnology ISSN: 1477-3155 Impact factor: 10.435
Figure 1Cuticle surfaces of sawfly larvae by SEM. Easy bleeders are A. rosae (a, b) and M. monticola (d). Non-easy bleeders are C. septentrionalis (c), H. australis (e), N. miliaris (f), P. parvula (g) and G. hercyniae (h). The dorso-lateral part of the abdomens is shown. Detailed view showing spider-like microstructures (b). Views showing blister-like swellings (c, e to g) or setae (h).
Figure 2Cuticle surfaces of sawfly larvae by SEM and related integument sections by LM. Non-easy bleeder is S. multifasciata (a, e). Easy bleeders are P. aterrima (b, f), A. padi (c, g), R. nodicornis (d) and R. bensoni (h). Views by SEM (a to d) show blister-like swellings (a) or spider-like microstructures (b to d). Views by LM (e to h) showing that, above a cellular layer, the cuticle comprises a procuticle, in blue, whereas the epicuticle, in red (e, g), is not observed in some species (f, h).
Easy bleeding, cuticle microstructures and hydrophobic property in sawfly larvae
| | ||||
| | ||||
| EB | + | ? | ? or 2.1 ± 0.0 | |
| | ||||
| EB | - | · | · | |
| EB | + | · | · | |
| EB | - | · | · | |
| EB | + | ? or 1.5 ± 0.0 | ? or 2.0 ± 0.0 | |
| EB | + | · | · | |
| EB | + | ? | ? | |
| EB | + | ? or 1.6 ± 0.1 | ? or 2.0 ± 0.1 | |
| N-EB | - | · | · | |
| | ||||
| N-EB | - | 1.6 ± 0.0 | 2.1 ± 0.0 | |
| N-EB | - | 1.7 ± 0.0 | 2.2 ± 0.1 | |
| N-EB* | - | 1.6 ± 0.1 | 2.2 ± 0.1 | |
| N-EB | - | · | · | |
| N-EB | - | · | · | |
| · | - | · | · | |
| N-EB* | - | · | · | |
| N-EB* | - | · | · | |
| N-EB | - | · | · | |
| N-EB | - | 1.9 ± 0.0 | 2.6 ± 0.0 | |
| · | - | · | · | |
| | ||||
| EB | + | 1.7 ± 0.2 | 2.2 ± 0.2 | |
| N-EB | - | 1.7 ± 0.1 | 2.1 ± 0.1 | |
| N-EB | - | 1.6 ± 0.1 | 2.1 ± 0.0 | |
| | ||||
| N-EB* | - | · | · | |
| | ||||
| N-EB | - | · | · | |
| | ||||
| N-EB | - | 1.6 ± 0.0 | 2.0 ± 0.0 |
1 Species was an easy bleeder (EB), or a non-easy bleeder (N-EB). Data from Boevé & Schaffner [4], except data from U Schaffner & JLB, unpublished results (*).
2 Spider-like microstructures were present (+) or absent (-) by observations of the cuticle surface by SEM and/or of cuticle sections by LM.
3 Cuticle was either too hydrophobic so that adherence of water droplet was impossible (?) or the diameter (mean ± SD, in mm) of a 2 and 4 μl droplet on the cuticle was measured. (·) Not tested.
Model input and output with force applied on cuticle of non-easy bleeders (A) and easy bleeders (B)
| 110 | 110 | 110 | 110 | 110 | 110 | 110 | 110 | |
| 20 | 20 | 20 | 7 | 5 | 8 | 8 | 11 | |
| 10 | 10 | 10 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 5 | |
| 500 | 500 | 500 | 500 | 500 | 500 | 500 | 500 | |
| 500 | 1000 | 5000 | 5000 | 5000 | 5000 | 5000 | 5000 | |
| 0.206 | 0.170 | 1.001 | 2.910 | 4.520 | 2.651 | 2.906 | 2.201 | |
| -0.835 | -1.003 | -1.604 | -4.167 | -6.240 | -6.482 | -4.633 | -3.772 | |
| 1.553 | 1.614 | 1.794 | 2.545 | 2.956 | 3.337 | 2.714 | 2.569 | |
| -0.363 | -0.383 | -0.447 | -0.717 | -0.860 | -0.864 | -0.764 | -0.710 | |
| 110 | 70 | 33.5 | 60 | 50 | 60 | |||
| 15 | 8 | 8 | 15 | 10 | 15 | |||
| 15 | 8 | 14 | 23 | 10 | 10 | |||
| 28 | 23 | 9 | 20 | 15 | 20 | |||
| 20 | 11 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 10 | |||
| 20 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |||
| 1 | 3.306 | 80 | 100 | 4 | 4 | |||
| 1 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
| 0.665 | 1.696 | 0.623 | 4.291 | 1.430 | 0.770 | |||
| -0.793 | -2.560 | -0.972 | -7.286 | -1.412 | -2.134 | |||
| 4.788 | 7.554 | 35.820 | 174.600 | 12.840 | 7.632 | |||
| -1.476 | -2.241 | -1.782 | -9.267 | -3.805 | -2.317 | |||
Model of non-easy bleeders was based on parameter values measured on LM and SEM views from H. crocea and N. pavidus together (M1/1, M1/2, M1/10), and from H. crocea (Hc), P. luridiventris (Pl), P. testacea (Pt), S. multifasciata (Sm) and T. scrophulariae (Ts). Different relative values of Young's modulus for procuticle (E1) and epicuticle (E2) were used in M1/1, M1/2, and M1/10.
Model of easy bleeders was based on parameter values measured on LM and SEM views from P. aterrima and R. micans together (M2), and from A. rosae (Ar), M. monticola (Mm), P. aterrima (Pa), R. bensoni (Rb) and R. nodicornis (Rn). Parameter values, in μm, introduced in the model: width of the model sample (W1), height of procuticle layer (H1), height of epicuticle layer (H2), height of microstructure (H3), diameter at base of microstructure (D1), diameter at top of microstructure (D2), shortest distance between microstructures (S1). Number of microstructures set under pressure (N μstr). Pressure applied per microstructure (P).
Stress values, obtained with a normal force (F 1z) or shear force (F 1x), are given as extreme values in traction (Max) and compression (Min).
Figure 3Models of the cuticle of sawfly larvae. Model representing a non-easy bleeder (a, c to e, g) and an easy bleeder (b, f, h). View in perspective showing five microstructures (b) and the location of the applied force (a, b). Maximal stress distribution in a section through the cuticle (c to h). The ratio of Young's modulus for the procuticle to the one of the epicuticle is assumed to be 1/1 (c), 1/2 (d) and 1/10 (e). The applied force is normal (c to f) or sheared (g, h). The maximal value corresponds to the maximal stress of the principal stress 1 and the minimal value to the minimal stress of the principal stress 2. Only the distribution of principal stress 1 is shown, while the maximal value is given in Table 2. Degrees of freedom = 120,553 (a, c to e, g), 40,701 (b, f, h).