Literature DB >> 1546152

Active control equivalence trials: some methodological aspects.

U Ferner1, N Neumann.   

Abstract

The therapeutic efficacy of an investigational new drug is best demonstrated in clinical trials against a placebo control. However, ethical requirements increasingly preclude the use of an inactive control substance as a treatment alternative, as clinical testing to compare the effects of active treatments, has become more frequent. The statistical evaluation and interpretation of these trials is complex and requires the demonstration of 'equivalence' or 'at-least equivalence' between the experimental drug and a comparable standard therapy. The design of controlled clinical trials to compare the effects of moclobemide, a new and selective monoamine oxidase-A inhibitor, with those of standard tricyclic antidepressant drugs involved the refinement of selection strategies, formulation of hypotheses, means of statistical analysis and clinical interpretation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1546152     DOI: 10.1007/bf02246246

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  2 in total

Review 1.  Issues in planning and interpreting active control equivalence studies.

Authors:  R Makuch; M Johnson
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Hazards of inference: the active control investigation.

Authors:  P D Leber
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 5.864

  2 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Design of clinical trials of antidepressants: should a placebo control arm be included?

Authors:  J Fritze; H J Möller
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.749

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.