Literature DB >> 1546147

Differentiation between major and minor depression.

M Philipp1, C D Delmo, R Buller, H Schwarze, P Winter, W Maier, O Benkert.   

Abstract

Though the concept of Major Depression was generated by clinicians using depressed inpatients as models, a polydiagnostic study in 600 psychiatric inpatients with heterogenous psychological disturbances revealed that all six competing operational definitions of Major Depression (including DSM-III-R and ICD-10) were too restrictive to serve as a general concept of depression. Another polydiagnostic study in 500 primary care outpatients showed that more than two-thirds of all non-chronic depressed cases were below the severity threshold of Major Depression: these patients are classified as Depression Not Otherwise Specified (NOS) by DSM-III-R. Loosening of the over-restrictive time criteria would broaden the concept of Major Depression so as to meet the requirements of a general concept of depression, while the definition of Minor Depression below the threshold of Major Depression would add to a reduction of cases of NOS Depression by more than 80%. For the evaluation of antidepressant drugs in outpatient samples, we propose that patients with these modified definitions of Major and Minor Depression be included, provided they meet a minimum severity criterion of 13 or more points on the Hamilton Depression Scale; four-fifths of the modified Major Depression group and one-third of the Minor Depression group do in fact meet this criterion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1546147     DOI: 10.1007/bf02246241

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  11 in total

1.  The concept of major depression. III. Concurrent validity of six competing operational definitions for the clinical ICD-9 diagnosis.

Authors:  M Philipp; W Maier; C D Delmo
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 5.270

2.  The concept of major depression. II. Agreement between six competing operational definitions in 600 psychiatric inpatients.

Authors:  M Philipp; W Maier; C D Delmo
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 5.270

3.  Predictors of therapeutic benefit from amitriptyline in mild depression: a general practice placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  E S Paykel; J A Hollyman; P Freeling; P Sedgwick
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  1988 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.839

4.  The polydiagnostic interview: a structured interview for the polydiagnostic classification of psychiatric patients.

Authors:  M Philipp; W Maier
Journal:  Psychopathology       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.944

5.  Nosology of primary affective disorders and application to clinical research.

Authors:  J P Feighner
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl       Date:  1981

6.  Diagnostic criteria for use in psychiatric research.

Authors:  J P Feighner; E Robins; S B Guze; R A Woodruff; G Winokur; R Munoz
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1972-01

7.  Research diagnostic criteria: rationale and reliability.

Authors:  R L Spitzer; J Endicott; E Robins
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1978-06

8.  Operational diagnosis of endogenous depression. II. Comparison of 8 different operational diagnoses.

Authors:  M Philipp; W Maier; O Benkert
Journal:  Psychopathology       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.944

9.  Identification of minor affective disorders and implications for psychopharmacotherapy.

Authors:  P Winter; M Philipp; R Buller; C D Delmo; H Schwarze; O Benkert
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 4.839

Review 10.  The concept of major depression. I. Descriptive comparison of six competing operational definitions including ICD-10 and DSM-III-R.

Authors:  M Philipp; W Maier; C D Delmo
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 5.270

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Subthreshold depression in adolescence: a systematic review.

Authors:  Eszter A Bertha; Judit Balázs
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 4.785

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.