Literature DB >> 1545974

Evaluation of intra-alveolar chlorhexidine dressings after removal of impacted mandibular third molars.

P G Fotos1, G F Koorbusch, D S Sarasin, R J Kist.   

Abstract

Chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX) has been investigated for its possible benefit in the prevention of alveolar osteitis complicating third molar removal. In a double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical study, 70 randomly selected healthy patients were subjected to uncomplicated mandibular third molar removal followed by CHX-gelatin sponge and saline solution-gelatin sponge intra-alveolar dressings. Each patient was followed for 6 days for postoperative discomfort and complications, and scored accordingly. The results demonstrated that patients receiving 0.2% CHX intra-alveolar dressings exhibited a significant reduction in postoperative discomfort and complications when compared with saline solution-treated control sites (p less than 0.005). Further, this phenomenon was not found to be related to patient factors including age, sex, and race, nor did any correlation exist between treated or control sites, and surgical factors including performing surgeon, surgeon's dominant hand, time of surgery, surgical site, and difficulty of the removal. These findings warrant further studies concerning the apparent clinical benefit of postextraction intra-alveolar CHX dressings for the reduction of postoperative alveolar osteitis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1545974     DOI: 10.1016/0030-4220(92)90140-l

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol        ISSN: 0030-4220


  6 in total

1.  Comparing the effects of chlorhexidine and persica on alveolar bone healing following tooth extraction in rats, a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Mojtaba Dorri; Shokufeh Shahrabi; Alireza Navabazam
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 2.  The association between oral microorgansims and aspiration pneumonia in the institutionalized elderly: review and recommendations.

Authors:  Cherin C Pace; Gary H McCullough
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 3.  Local interventions for the management of alveolar osteitis (dry socket).

Authors:  Blánaid Jm Daly; Mohammad O Sharif; Kate Jones; Helen V Worthington; Anna Beattie
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-09-26

4.  A randomized clinical trial compared the effect of intra-alveolar 0.2 % Chlorohexidine bio-adhesive gel versus 0.12% Chlorohexidine rinse in reducing alveolar osteitis following molar teeth extractions.

Authors:  Nedal-Abdullah Abu-Mostafa; Abdullah Alqahtani; Mohammed Abu-Hasna; Ahmed Alhokail; Ammar Aladsani
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2015-01-01

5.  The efficacy of 1% Betadine mouthwash on the incidence of dry socket after mandibular third molar surgery.

Authors:  Dariush Hasheminia; Amirhossein Moaddabi; Saeid Moradi; Parisa Soltani; Mahsa Moannaei; Maryam Issazadeh
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2018-05-01

6.  Efficacy of plasma rich in growth factor used for dry socket management: a systematic review.

Authors:  J-L Xu; R Xia
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2019-11-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.