Literature DB >> 15459738

When even the 'best-laid' plans go wrong.

Katherine McComas1.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2004        PMID： 15459738      PMCID： PMC1299213          DOI： 10.1038/sj.embor.7400257

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EMBO Rep        ISSN： 1469-221X            Impact factor:   8.807


× No keyword cloud information.
  6 in total

1.  An approach to the study of communicative acts.

Authors:  T M NEWCOMB
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1953-11       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Risk communication and public confidence in health departments.

Authors:  S Dandoy
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 3.  Optimistic biases about personal risks.

Authors:  N D Weinstein
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-12-08       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Evaluating risk communication: narrative vs. technical presentations of information about radon.

Authors:  D Golding; S Krimsky; A Plough
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 4.000

5.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.

Authors:  A Tversky; D Kahneman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1974-09-27       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Testing a structured decision approach: value-focused thinking for deliberative risk communication.

Authors:  J L Arvai; R Gregory; T L McDaniels
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.000
  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  Are you experienced? Junior scientists should make the most of opportunities to develop skills outside the laboratory.

Authors:  T L Raoul Tan; Dunja Potocnik
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 8.807

2.  Confidence in social institutions, perceived vulnerability and the adoption of recommended protective behaviors in Brazil during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Jose Storopoli; Wilson Levy Braga da Silva Neto; Gustavo S Mesch
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 4.634
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.