Literature DB >> 15459459

Volume-outcome relation for hospitals performing angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: results from the Nationwide Japanese Registry.

Miyuki Tsuchihashi1, Hiroyuki Tsutsui, Hideo Tada, Miwako Shihara, Akira Takeshita, Suminori Kono.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to use a contemporary database to examine the relationship between annual hospital volume and the outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), given the wide spread use of coronary stents. An inverse relation exists between the number of PCIs and short-term outcome, but PCI practice has been changing with the availability of new devices such as stents. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Data from the 1997 Japanese nationwide registry were analyzed to determine the relation between the annual hospital volume of PCI procedures for patients with AMI and in-hospital mortality, as well as the need for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. A total of 129 hospitals (2,491 patients) were divided into terciles according to the annual volume. Of the procedures, 39% involved coronary stents. Median annual PCI volumes varied across terciles from low =10, middle =33, and high =89. After adjusting for patient characteristics, there was no significant relationship between volume and in-hospital mortality (trend P=0.66) and CABG (trend P=0.35). Among patients who received stents (n=958), there was no significant association between volume and either mortality or CABG.
CONCLUSIONS: Using the contemporary database, there was no significant relationship between hospital volume and in-hospital outcome among AMI patients undergoing PCIs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15459459     DOI: 10.1253/circj.68.887

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ J        ISSN: 1346-9843            Impact factor:   2.993


  3 in total

1.  Referral Regions for Time-Sensitive Acute Care Conditions in the United States.

Authors:  David J Wallace; Deepika Mohan; Derek C Angus; Julia R Driessen; Christopher M Seymour; Donald M Yealy; Mark M Roberts; Kristen S Kurland; Jeremy M Kahn
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 5.721

2.  Quality of reporting internal and external validity data from randomized controlled trials evaluating stents for percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Morgane Ethgen; Lsabelle Boutron; Philippe Gabriel Steg; Carine Roy; Philippe Ravaud
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 4.615

3.  Differences of in-hospital outcomes within patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention at institutions with high versus low procedural volume: a report from the Japanese multicentre percutaneous coronary intervention registry.

Authors:  Masaki Kodaira; Toshiki Kuno; Yohei Numasawa; Takahiro Ohki; Iwao Nakamura; Ikuko Ueda; Keiichi Fukuda; Shun Kohsaka
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2018-07-11
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.