Literature DB >> 15459219

Identification of novel prognosticators of outcome in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

Volkert B Wreesmann1, Weiji Shi, Howard T Thaler, Ashok Poluri, Dennis H Kraus, David Pfister, Ashok R Shaha, Jatin P Shah, Pulivarthi H Rao, Bhuvanesh Singh.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to identify chromosomal aberrations associated with poor outcome in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We assessed the global genomic composition of 82 HNSCCs from previously untreated patients with comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). The CGH data were subcategorized into individual cytogenetic bands. Only genomic aberrations occurring in more than 5% of cases were analyzed, and redundancies were eliminated. Each aberration was submitted to univariate analysis to assess its relationship with disease-specific survival (DSS). We used Monte Carlo simulations (MCS) to adjust P values for the log-rank approximate chi(2) statistics for each abnormality and further applied the Hochberg-Benjamini procedure to adjust the P values for multiple testing of the large number of abnormalities. We then submitted abnormalities whose univariate tests resulted in an adjusted P value of less than.15 together with significant demographic/clinical variables to stepwise Cox proportional hazards regression. We again verified and adjusted P values for the chi(2) approximation of the final model by MCS.
RESULTS: CGH analysis revealed a recurrent pattern of chromosomal aberrations typical for HNSCC. Univariate analysis revealed 38 abnormalities that were correlated with DSS. After controlling for multiple comparisons and confounding effects of stage, five chromosomal aberrations were significantly associated with outcome, including amplification at 11q13, gain of 12q24, and losses at 5q11, 6q14, and 21q11 (MCS adjusted P =.0009 to P =.01).
CONCLUSION: HNSCC contains a complex pattern of chromosomal aberrations. A sequential approach to control for multiple comparisons and effect of confounding variables allows the identification of clinically relevant aberrations. The significance of each individual abnormality merits further consideration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15459219     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2004.01.094

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  15 in total

Review 1.  Genomic screening of head and neck cancer and its implications for therapy planning.

Authors:  Jan Akervall
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2006-03-31       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 2.  Current potential and limitations of molecular diagnostic methods in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Magdy E Mahfouz; Juan P Rodrigo; Robert P Takes; Mohamed N Elsheikh; Alessandra Rinaldo; Ruud H Brakenhoff; Alfio Ferlito
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Chromosomal changes characterize head and neck cancer with poor prognosis.

Authors:  Verena L Bauer; Herbert Braselmann; Michael Henke; Dominik Mattern; Axel Walch; Kristian Unger; Michael Baudis; Silke Lassmann; Reinhard Huber; Johannes Wienberg; Martin Werner; Horst F Zitzelsberger
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 4.599

4.  Clinicopathological and prognostic implications of genetic alterations in oral cancers.

Authors:  Swapnali M Pathare; Moritz Gerstung; Niko Beerenwinkel; Alejandro A Schäffer; Sadhana Kannan; Prathamesh Pai; K Alok Pathak; Anita M Borges; Manoj B Mahimkar
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.967

5.  Targeted inhibition of ATR or CHEK1 reverses radioresistance in oral squamous cell carcinoma cells with distal chromosome arm 11q loss.

Authors:  Madhav Sankunny; Rahul A Parikh; Dale W Lewis; William E Gooding; William S Saunders; Susanne M Gollin
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 5.006

6.  Smad4 loss in mice causes spontaneous head and neck cancer with increased genomic instability and inflammation.

Authors:  Sophia Bornstein; Ruth White; Stephen Malkoski; Masako Oka; Gangwen Han; Timothy Cleaver; Douglas Reh; Peter Andersen; Neil Gross; Susan Olson; Chuxia Deng; Shi-Long Lu; Xiao-Jing Wang
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2009-10-19       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 7.  Chromosomal imbalances in oral squamous cell carcinoma: examination of 31 cell lines and review of the literature.

Authors:  Christa Lese Martin; Shalini C Reshmi; Thomas Ried; William Gottberg; John W Wilson; Jaya K Reddy; Poornima Khanna; Jonas T Johnson; Eugene N Myers; Susanne M Gollin
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2007-08-02       Impact factor: 5.337

Review 8.  DNA copy number variation and loss of heterozygosity in relation to recurrence of and survival from head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a review.

Authors:  Yu Chen; Chu Chen
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.147

9.  Establishment and Molecular Cytogenetic Characterization of a Cell Culture Model of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC).

Authors:  Verena L Bauer; Ludwig Hieber; Quirin Schaeffner; Johannes Weber; Herbert Braselmann; Reinhard Huber; Axel Walch; Horst Zitzelsberger
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 4.096

10.  Genome-Wide Loss of Heterozygosity and DNA Copy Number Aberration in HPV-Negative Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Their Associations with Disease-Specific Survival.

Authors:  Chu Chen; Yuzheng Zhang; Melissa M Loomis; Melissa P Upton; Pawadee Lohavanichbutr; John R Houck; David R Doody; Eduardo Mendez; Neal Futran; Stephen M Schwartz; Pei Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.